宁波市的姚江、奉化江和甬江俗称“三江”。基于2013—2016年7次水文测验资料,并结合多年潮位资料和1987年水文测验资料,对三江河道水沙变化规律及其成因进行了分析。研究表明:三江河道径流“顶浑”作用较强,含沙量自甬江口向上游逐渐递减;受海平面上升、河势变化和人类活动的综合影响,三江河道各潮位站平均高潮位自20世纪80年代起均呈抬升趋势;2010—2016年镇海站平均高潮位较20世纪80年代抬升了0.33 m;近30 a来,同样潮差下,甬江口断面涨潮平均流速无明显变化,涨潮量呈减小趋势,而含沙量和输沙量呈增大趋势。研究成果为三江河道的河床演变分析提供了一定的科学依据,以及为甬江流域的治理提供了一定的技术支撑。
Abstract
Yaojiang River, Fenghua River and Yongjiang River are known as “Three Rivers of Ningbo”. According to hydrological data measured for seven times during 2013-2016, together with measured hydrological data in 1987 and tide data for many years, the characteristics and causes of flow and sediment change in the Three Rivers were analyzed. Results revealed that runoff had large effect on slowing down sediment transport from estuaries to upstream, and sediment concentration gradually decreased from estuaries to the upstream in Yongjiang River. The average high tide level displayed a rising trend since the 1980s on account of sea level rise, river regime change and human activities. In 2010-2016, the average high tide level at Zhenhai station was 0.33 m higher than that in the 1980s. In the past three decades, under the same tidal range, the mean velocity of rising tide in Yongjiang River estuary experienced no significant change; while influx showed a trend of decrease, yet sediment concentration and sediment discharge showed a trend of increase. The research findings offer scientific basis for riverbed evolution research and technical support for the regulation of Yongjiang river drainage basin.
关键词
宁波市三江河道 /
水沙变化规律 /
潮汐特征 /
含沙量 /
输沙量
Key words
Three Rivers of Ningbo /
characteristics of flow and sediment change /
tidal characteristic /
sediment concentration /
sediment discharge
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈 珺,嵇 敏,张洪记,等. 甬江洪枯季水沙特性分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2012,(5): 48-54.
[2] 沈承烈. 甬江的冲淤规律及其影响因素[J]. 杭州大学学报(自然科学版), 1983,10(4): 534-544.
[3] 张定邦,李春玲,李旺生. 甬江河床演变分析[J]. 水道港口, 1986,(3): 1-12.
[4] 高辉巧,张晓雷,孙东坡. 宝达码头扩建对甬江河段行洪影响分析[J]. 水利水电技术,2008,39(7): 82-85.
[5] 严文武. 宁波三江河道水沙特性及冲淤变化规律[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2011,(4): 143-148.
[6] 蒋文志,马洪亮,王 震. 甬江和口外金塘水道水沙特性及悬沙输移分析[J]. 科学技术与工程,2013,13(11): 3162-3166.
[7] 倪晋仁,王光谦. 论悬移质浓度垂线分布的两种类型及其产生的原因[J]. 水利学报,1987,(7): 60-68.
[8] 吴 涛,康建成,李卫江,等. 中国近海海平面变化研究进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质. 2007,27(4): 123-130.
[9] 李志永,胡成飞,程文龙,等. 三江河道近期淤积成因专题研究[R]. 杭州:浙江省水利河口研究院,2017.
[10]郜会彩,李志永,王瑞峰,等.宁波镇海港区淤积机理及影响因素分析[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2013,30(7): 7-10.
[11]倪勇强,林 洁. 河口区治江围涂对杭州湾水动力及海床影响分析[J]. 海洋工程,2003,21(3): 73-77.
[12]赵淳逸. 桥梁工程对感潮河段水动力影响研究[D]. 南京:河海大学,2007.
[13]褚晓岑,唐洪武,袁赛瑜,等. 甬江感潮河流桥梁群对防洪纳潮累积影响[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,42(3): 223-229.
[14]劳可军,葛更坚,陈 琦,等. 甬江岸线利用详细规划方案[R]. 宁波:宁波市交通运输委员会、宁波市港航管理局、宁波中交水运设计研究有限公司,2014.
[15]张定邦,袁美琦,王育林. 甬江口悬沙模型试验[J]. 泥沙研究, 1981,(2): 42-51.
[16]韩曾萃,程杭平,史英标,等. 钱塘江河口咸水入侵长历时预测和对策[J]. 水利学报, 2012,43(2): 232-240.
[17]胡成飞,张松达,李志永,等. 径、潮流交互作用对甬江河床冲淤变化的影响[C]∥第十届全国泥沙基本理论研究学术讨论会. 武汉:中国水利学会泥沙专业委员会,2017:554-560.
[18]XIE D, PAN C, WU X, et al. The Variations of Sediment Transport Patterns in the Outer Changjiang Estuary and Hangzhou Bay over the Last 30 Years[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2017, 122(4): 2999-3020.
PDF(2498 KB)
