将降雨数值预报产品运用到水文预报中已经逐渐成为提高洪水作业预报的预见期的重要手段。为充分了解ECMWF(European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts)和WRF(Weather Research and Forecasting model)2种数值天气预报产品对嘉陵江研究区面雨量预报的预报精度和误差分布,且为增强洪水预报精度的稳健性提供科学支持,采用TS评分、空报率、漏报率、正确率等指标,对嘉陵江地区7个气象分区内的2016年汛期面雨量预报结果进行了检验,分析了不同分区内各检验指标与预报时效的关系。结果表明:ECMWF数值预报产品和WRF数值预报产品均可用于该地区晴雨预报,且2种产品的预报精度随降水等级的增大呈增大趋势,随预报时效的增加呈减小趋势。综合而言,ECMWF数值预报产品对嘉陵江研究区的预报效果更好。
Abstract
Numerical product has been an important means to improve the anticipation period of hydrological forecast. In the purpose of understanding areal rainfall forecast accuracy and error distribution of ECMWF (European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts) and WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting Model) and providing scientific support for improving the robustness of flood forecast accuracy, we verified the forecast results of areal rainfall in flood season of 2016 in seven subareas of Jialing River Basin by examining indexes involving TS score, false alarm rate, point over rate, and success hit rate. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between the abovementioned indexes and the period of forecast validity in the subareas. Results suggest that ECMWF product and WRF product could be both applied to the sunny/rainy forecast in the study area. The forecast accuracy improves with the increase of rainfall grade, but reduces with the decrease of forecast validity period. In general, ECMWF has better forecast efficiency in the Jialing river basin.
关键词
面雨量 /
数值预报产品 /
嘉陵江流域 /
降水分级检验 /
预报精度评估
Key words
areal rainfall /
numerical forecast product /
Jialing River Basin /
precipitation classification /
forecast precision evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 徐晶, 姚学祥. 流域面雨量估算技术综述[J]. 气象, 2007, 33(7):15-21.
[2] ARNAUD P, BOUVIER C, CISNEROS L, et al. Influence of Rainfall Spatial Variability on Flood Prediction[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 260(1/4):216-230.
[3] 吴丹瑞, 吴安琪, 何新玥,等. 赣南地区近58年来极端气候变化趋势分析[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2017, 34(1):24-29.
[4] 毕宝贵, 代刊, 王毅,等. 定量降水预报技术进展[J]. 应用气象学报, 2016, 27(5):534-549.
[5] 王雨. 2004年主汛期各数值预报模式定量降水预报评估[J]. 应用气象学报, 2006, 17(3):316-324.
[6] 王雨, 闫之辉. 2004年汛期(5—9月)主客观降水预报检验[J]. 热带气象学报, 2006, 22(4):331-339.
[7] 张宁娜, 黄阁, 吴曼丽,等. 2010年国内外3种数值预报在东北地区的预报检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(2):28-33.
[8] 刘静, 叶金印, 张晓红,等. 2011年6—8月淮河流域面雨量预报检验[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012,(36):17698-17700,17707.
[9] 邱辉, 訾丽. WRF模型在山洪灾害预警预报中的试验应用[J]. 人民长江, 2013, 44(13):5-9.
[10] PENNELLY C,REUTER G,FLESCH T.Verification of the WRF Model for Simulating Heavy Precipitation in Alberta[J].Atmospheric Research,2014(135/136):172-192.
[11] 张行南, 程晓红. 网格法在流域面雨量计算中的应用研究[J]. 东北水利水电, 2005, 22(5):16-17.
[12] 刘小虎, 赵雅贤, 杨鹏. 利用网格插值算法计算流域面平均降雨[J]. 海河水利, 2003,(3):45-46.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51420105014); 水利部公益性行业科研专项(201401034)