基于流量-面积比值的小流域设计洪水计算方法对比研究

幸新涪, 周火明, 秦维, 谭昭娣, 卢宇, 张乾柱, 卢阳

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 57-62.

PDF(2124 KB)
PDF(2124 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 57-62. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20160943
防洪减灾

基于流量-面积比值的小流域设计洪水计算方法对比研究

  • 幸新涪1, 周火明1, 秦维2, 谭昭娣2, 卢宇2, 张乾柱1, 卢阳1
作者信息 +

Comparison of Calculation Methods for Design Flood ofSmall Catchments Based on Flow-Area Ratio

  • XING Xin-fu1, ZHOU Huo-ming1, QIN Wei2, TAN Zhao-di2, LU Yu2, ZHANG Qian-zhu1, LU Yang1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为确定分布式模型法、地区瞬时单位线法及推理公式法在估算山区小流域设计洪水过程中的适用性,基于洪峰流量-流域面积比值,以重庆市綦江区蒲河水系为研究对象,采用3种方法分别进行设计洪水计算,并与重庆市实测100 a一遇洪峰流量进行对比。结果表明:①当流域面积<10 km2时,采用推理公式法更合理可靠;此时河道坡度较大,流域的产、汇流条件符合推理公式法假定条件,计算结果符合实际。②当流域面积为10~100 km2时,分布式模型法与地区瞬时单位线法均可合理计算设计洪水,但前者计算结果比后者更接近实测值。此类流域河道长、坡度平缓,流域的水动力在空间中可视为均匀的扩散;计算格栅单元间连续性强,各栅格向流域出口演算能合理反映真实的设计洪水过程。③当流域面积>100 km2时,3种方法计算结果与实测值均有不同程度的偏离,但分布式模型法偏离程度最低,可作为设计洪水计算的首选方法。研究结果将有助于合理选择设计洪水计算方法,为类似山区小流域设计洪水计算提供参考。

Abstract

The design flood in a mountainous small catchment was calculated by using distributed model, regional instantaneous unit hydrograph, and deducted formula respectively based on the ratio of peak discharge to catchment area, and the calculated results were further compared with the measured peak discharge of 100-year flood to determine the applicability of the above-mentioned three methods. Puhe river system in Qijiang, Chongqing was selected as a case study. Conclusions are drawn as follows 1) deducted formula is more accurate and reliable for catchment with an area smaller than 10 km2 as steep river slope makes the runoff yield and concentration condition consistent with the assumption of the deducted formula; 2) distributed model and regional instantaneous unit hydrograph are both applicable to catchment with an area between 10-100 km2, with the result of the former closer to measured result; in such catchment of long channel and gentle slope, the hydrodynamic dispersion can be regarded as uniform diffusion in space, and the computation grid units are strongly continuous, well reflecting the real design flood process; 3) distributed model is recommended as the preferred method when catchment area is larger than 100 km2, as it deviates to the smallest extent to the measured value among the three methods. The conclusions will be helpful to the selection of a reasonable calculation method.

关键词

山洪灾害 / 设计洪水 / 分布式模型法 / 地区瞬时单位线法 / 推理公式法

Key words

mountain flood disaster / design flood / distributed model / regional instantaneous unit hydrograph / deducted formula

引用本文

导出引用
幸新涪, 周火明, 秦维, 谭昭娣, 卢宇, 张乾柱, 卢阳. 基于流量-面积比值的小流域设计洪水计算方法对比研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2018, 35(1): 57-62 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20160943
XING Xin-fu, ZHOU Huo-ming, QIN Wei, TAN Zhao-di, LU Yu, ZHANG Qian-zhu, LU Yang. Comparison of Calculation Methods for Design Flood ofSmall Catchments Based on Flow-Area Ratio[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(1): 57-62 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20160943
中图分类号: P333   

参考文献

[1] 全国山洪灾害防治项目组.山洪灾害分析评价技术要求[R].北京:全国山洪灾害防治项目组,2015.
[2] 张红萍.山区小流域洪水风险评估与预警技术研究[D].北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院,2013.
[3] 芮孝芳.地貌瞬时单位线研究进展[J].水科学进展,1999,10(3):345-350.
[4] 孔凡哲,韩继伟,赵 磊,等.分布式单位线分析方法的对比分析[J].人民黄河,2011,33(1):28-30.
[5] 芮孝芳,石 朋.基于地貌扩散和水动力扩散的流域瞬时单位线研究[J].水科学进展,2002,13(4):439-444.
[6] 王国安,贺顺德,李超群,等.论广东省综合单位线的基本原理和适用条件[J].人民黄河,2011,33(3):15-18.
[7] 王国安,贺顺德,李荣容,等.论推理公式的基本原理和适用条件[J].人民黄河,2010,32(12):1-4.
[8] 陈家琦,张恭肃.小流域暴雨洪水计算[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1985.
[9] 彭万兵,赵 东.重庆市万州区山洪灾害分析评价报告[R].重庆:长江上游水文水资源勘测局,2015.
[10]芮孝芳.水文学原理[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2004.
[11]范姝云.基于SCS模型的尖山河小流域不同土地利用类型地表径流及COD污染负荷研究[D].昆明:西南林业大学,2015.
[12]四川省水利厅.四川省中小流域暴雨洪水计算手册[K].成都:四川省水利厅,1984.
[13]四川省水利厅.四川省暴雨洪水图集[K].成都:四川省水利厅,2011.
[14]詹道江,叶守泽.工程水文学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2000.

基金

中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项项目(CKSF2016034/CQ)

PDF(2124 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map