为摸清修建防渗渠道对戈壁区河流生态系统的影响,以期能为柴达木盆地农业绿洲制定可持续发展的政策提供依据,在社会经济调查的基础上,以大格勒流域为研究对象,通过野外取样和室内化验,对比分析了修建防渗渠道前后的地表河流水质、河岸植被及土壤理化性状。研究结果表明①修建防渗渠道对河流水质具有净化作用,但效果不显著(P>0.05);②修建防渗渠道不利于戈壁区沿河植被繁殖生长,流域内植被平均盖度降低4.5%,生物量减少330.2 kg/hm2,死亡率增加6.5%;河岸土壤质地呈现退化趋势(P<0.05),其中砂粒含量增加8.68%,有机质减少0.53 g/kg。基于以上研究成果,建议在河流出山口处修建生态闸,洪水期引洪灌溉河岸植被;布设生态水利工程,以实现流域生态环境与绿洲社会经济的可持续发展。
Abstract
In order to investigate the impacts of anti-seepage channel construction on the river ecosystem in Gobi area and to provide reference for the sustainable development policy of agricultural oasis in Qaidam Basin, we compared the water quality of surface rivers, the riparian vegetation, and the physical and chemical properties of soil before and after the construction of anti-seepage channels in Dagele watershed through field sampling and laboratory analysis based on socio-economic surveys. Results reveal that 1) constructed anti-seepage channels could purify river water quality, but the effect is insignificant (P＞0.05); 2) anti-seepage channels are not conducive to the reproduction and growth of riparian vegetation in Gobi area, with the average coverage ratio decreased by 4.5%, biomass decreased by 330.2 kg/hm2, and vegetation mortality increased by 6.5%; 3) the soil texture displayed a degrading trend (P＜0.05), with the sand content increasing by 8.68% and organic substances decreased by 0.53 g/kg. Ecological sluices at the outlet of mountains are recommended for the flood diversion and irrigation in flood season. Ecological water conservancy projects should also be constructed to achieve a sustainable development of eco-environment in the basin.
关键词
柴达木盆地 /
大格勒流域 /
防渗渠道 /
生态系统 /
可持续发展
Key words
Qaidam Basin /
Dagele river watershed /
anti-seepage channels /
ecosystem /
sustainable development
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 谭 毅.柴达木盆地水系、地表水资源及其特点[J].水利科技与经济,2014,20(4):51-54.
[2] 卢 娜.柴达木盆地湖泊面积变化及影响因素分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(8):83-87.
[3] 熊卫国.格尔木大格勒乡枸杞生产经济效益浅析[J].青海农林科技,2011,(2):30-32.
[4] 徐鹏云.格尔木年鉴(2012—2014) [M].西宁:青海人民出版社,2014:425-427.
[5] 陈 明.都兰绿洲水资源利用规划研究与防沙治沙技术[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011.
[6] 董 雯,杨 宇,张豫芳.绿洲城镇发展与水土资源开发的耦合效应及其时空分异[J].资源科学,2013,35(7):1355-1362.
[7] 周 丹,盖艾鸿,杨 柳.基于模糊模型识别法的土地整理综合效益分析评价研究——以格尔木市为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(5):208-213.
[8] 徐浩杰,杨太保.柴达木盆地植被生长时空变化特征及其对气候要素的响应[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(3):398-409.
[9] 汪亚莉,许 模,张 强,等.云南洱海东侧引水隧道地下水环境负效应探讨[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2016,33(2):14-18.
[10]时 鹏,陈利顶,汪亚峰,等.廊道式建设工程生态影响评价范围[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(1):132-139.
[11]鲁春霞,谢高地,成升魁,等.水利工程对河流生态系统服务功能的影响评价方法初探[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(5):803 -807.
[12]KINGSFORD R. Ecology of Desert Rivers[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006:336-344.
[13]魏 智,金会军,蓝永超,等.黑河流域水工程对生态环境的影响[J].中国农村水利水电,2007,(7):6-9.
[14]郭伟杰,赵伟华,王振华.梯级引水式水电站对底栖动物群落结构的影响[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2015,32(6): 87-93.
[15]HUANG X,MA J X.Changes in the Ecosystem Service Values of Typical River Basins in Arid Regions of Northwest China[J]. Ecohydrology,2013,6(6):1048-1056.
[16]唐晓燕,曹学章,王文林.美国和加拿大水利工程生态调度管理研究及对中国的借鉴[J].生态与农村环境学报,2013,29(3):394-402.
[17]王贵玲,刘志明.西北绿洲的水资源合理开发利用——以青海省格尔木—诺木洪山前绿洲为例[J].地球学报,2001,22(4):311-316.
[18]《中国河湖大典》编纂委员会.中国河湖大典·西北诸河卷[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2014:206-207.
[19]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007:46-73.
[20]国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法(第四版)(增补版)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2002:210-257.
基金
林业公益性行业科研专项(201404304-03)
PDF(1340 KB)
