目前塑料排水板(Prefabricated Vertical Drains， PVD)处理地基的固结计算均采用传统的砂井等效法，其等效直径可通过较多计算式得到，如周长等效法、周长折减0.75倍等效法(《海堤工程设计规范》(GB/T 51015—2014))等，但目前还没有形成统一的认识。基于等应变假设，类比于砂井地基固结理论，重新推导了排水板地基固结解析解，并通过ADINA有限元软件验证其合理性。然后采用有限元法对排水板地基固结的二维(2D)模型(即排水板渗透系数kw→+∞时)进行研究，认为在2D固结模型下Long和Covo(1994)的砂井等效法与有限元计算成果较接近，但仍存在一定偏差。最后，给出了2D固结模型下精度更高的等效直径计算式。该研究对排水板处理地基固结有参考作用。
Abstract
At present, traditional sand well consolidation theory is adopted to calculate the consolidation characteristics of foundation treated by prefabricated vertical drains. The equivalent diameter of prefabricated vertical drain can be obtained by formulas including Hansbo’s perimeter equivalence and the equivalent reduction 0.75 times the perimeter in Code for Design of Sea Dike Project. But there is no unified understanding on it. In view of this, an analytical solution for the consolidation of foundation treated by prefabricated vertical drains is presented based on equal strain assumption. The rationality of this solution is validated by using ADINA. Furthermore, finite element method is adopted to build a 2D model of foundation treated by prefabricated vertical drains. The coefficient of permeability of drain tends to infinity in the model. It is found that the consolidation characteristics in the 2D model by Long & Covo (1994) are close to those by finite element method, yet with some deviations. Finally, the formula for calculating the equivalent diameter of 2D consolidation model of higher accuracy is given.
关键词
塑料排水板 /
固结理论 /
2D固结模型 /
等应变假设 /
等效直径 /
井阻因子
Key words
prefabricated vertical drains /
consolidation theory /
2D consolidation model /
equal strain assumption /
equivalent diameter /
well resistance factor
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] HANSBO S. Consolidation of Fine-grained Soils by Prefabricated Drains∥Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Balkema,Rotterdam,The Netherlands,June 19th,1981:677-682.
LONG R,COVO A. Equivalent Diameter of Vertical Drains with an Oblong Cross Section. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1994,120(9): 1625-1630.
ATKINSON M S,ELDRED P J L. Consolidation of Soil Using Vertical Drains. Géotechnique,1981,31(1):33-43.
CHAI J C,MIURA N.Investigation of Factors Affecting Vertical Drain Behavior. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1999,125(3):216-226.
FELLENIUS B H,CASTONGUAY N G. The Efficiency of Band Shaped Drains: a Full Scale Laboratory Study. U.S.:National Research Council and the Industrial Research Assistance Programme, 1985.
ABUEL-NAGA H M,BOUAZZA A. Equivalent Diameter of Prefabricated Vertical Drain. Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2009,27(3): 227-231.
ABUEL-NAGA H M,BOUAZZA A,BERGADO D T. Numerical Assessment of Equivalent Diameter Equations for Prefabricated Vertical Drains. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2012,49(12): 1427-1433.
GB/T 51015—2014,海堤工程设计规范. 北京:中国计划出版社,2015.
HUANG Chao-xuan, DENG Yue-bao, CHEN Fei. Consolidation Theory for Prefabricated Vertical Drains with Elliptic Cylindrical Assumption.Computers and Geotechnics, 2016,77(1):156-166.
谢康和,曾国熙. 等应变条件下的砂井地基固结解析理论. 岩土工程学报,1989,11(2):3-17.
朱森林. 堆载预压技术在潮汕机场大面积深厚软土地基处理中的应用. raybet体育在线
院报, 2014, 31(9): 43-46.
基金
浙江省水利水电勘测设计院科标业项目(B1608,B1609);水利部公益性行业科研专项(201401010)
PDF(2193 KB)
