基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20150402

院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 111-115.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150402

基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究

刘光凤¹,王林¹,周泽²,邢青松¹

1.重庆交通大学经济与管理学院,重庆 400074;
2.重庆中科建设集团有限公司,重庆 400061

收稿日期:2015-05-15 出版日期:2016-10-20 发布日期:2016-10-17
作者简介:刘光凤(1987-),女,重庆人,博士研究生,主要从事工程管理和风险管理研究,(电话)13647656658(电子信箱)546290122@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71401019);重庆市社会科学规划项目(2011YBGL112)

Optimization of Slope Treatment Schemes Based on Gray Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making

LIU Guang-feng¹, WANG Lin¹, ZHOU Ze², XING Qing-song¹

1.School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China;
2.Chongqing Zhongke Construction Group Company Limited, Chongqing 400061, China

Received:2015-05-15 Online:2016-10-20 Published:2016-10-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为抑制边坡处治中常见的边坡处治方案选择不合理的现象,根据边坡处治方案优选过程的灰性、模糊性、多属性、群体性特征和安全、质量、造价、工期、环境5大建设管理基本目标,运用灰度、隶属度、多属性和群决策构建基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选模型。以布卡隧道进口K214+500至K214+700边坡工程为例,验证所构建模型的可行性。研究结果表明该模型能够充分利用受邀专家的咨询意见,使优选过程考虑更全面、更符合实际,提高优选结果的准确性,具有较好的实用性。

关键词: 边坡处治, 方案优选, 灰色模糊多属性群决策, 灰色模糊集, 灰度, 隶属度

Abstract: To curb the common phenomenon that slope treatment schemes are selected unreasonably in practice, a model of optimizing slope treatment schemes based on gray fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making is proposed through combined application of membership degree, gray degree, multi-attribute decision-making, and group decision-making. The fuzzy, gray, multi-attribute, and group characteristics of slope treatment schemes optimizationprocess as well as five basic goals of safety, quality, cost, time and environment in project construction management are taken as the basis. The slope treatment project from K214+500 to K214+700 of Buka tunnel entrance is taken as a case study to verify the feasibility of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed model is more comprehensive and practical by making full use of invited experts’ advices. It also improves the accuracy of the optimization result.

Key words: slope treatment, optimization of schemes, gray fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making, gray fuzzy set, gray degree, membership degree

中图分类号:

U416.0

刘光凤,王林,周泽,邢青松. 基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究[J]. 院报, 2016, 33(10): 111-115.

LIU Guang-feng, WANG Lin, ZHOU Ze, XING Qing-song. Optimization of Slope Treatment Schemes Based on Gray Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making[J]. JOURNAL OF YANGTZE RIVER SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTI, 2016, 33(10): 111-115.

[1]	宋佳, 白杨, 王小林. 基于深度学习的黄土干湿循环损伤分析[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(2): 87-94.
[2]	李厚民, 吴克洋, 柯俊宏, 汪洋. 低应变状态下橡胶混凝土细观裂缝数值分析[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(4): 149-155.
[3]	周剑, 雷畅, 郑强, 魏鹏帅, 丁高俊, 卞小草. 基于灰度理论QFD的水电工程施工管理系统研发[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(12): 151-156.
[4]	杜德持, 王渭明, 刘鹏, 吕显州, 张为社. 小净距隧道群稳定性判定因素及施工顺序优化研究[J]. 院报, 2018, 35(4): 109-116.
[5]	苗正伟, 徐利岗. 基于隶属度修正的加权马尔可夫链的降水预测[J]. 院报, 2018, 35(1): 40-46.
[6]	孟颖, 唐德善, 石蓝星, 王晓淋. 基于改进指标体系的水资源调控方案评价模型[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(5): 9-13.
[7]	刘光凤,王林,周泽,邢青松. 基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究[J]. 院报, 2016, 33(10): 111-115.
[8]	胡向阳, 许明, 邹先坚, 马志敏. B超在含沙量及其垂线分布测量中的首次应用[J]. 院报, 2014, 31(2): 12-15.
[9]	罗轶，任光明，王志红，宋杨. 某水库库岸稳定性的模糊综合评判[J]. 院报, 2011, 28(6): 67-70.
[10]	雷鹏, 顾冲时, 郑东健. 应用粗糙隶属度确定大坝效应量分量比例 [J]. 院报, 2005, 22(5): 29-32.
[11]	薛仓生, 金菊良, 魏一鸣. 水利工程方案优选的投影寻踪方法[J]. 院报, 2005, 22(4): 80-83.
[12]	袁俊平,殷宗泽,包承纲. 膨胀土裂隙的量化手段与度量指标研究[J]. 院报, 2003, 20(6): 27-30.
[13]	田野. 三峡工程岩石力学参数Fuzzy选择[J]. 院报, 1989, 6(1): 9-18 .

基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究

Optimization of Slope Treatment Schemes Based on Gray Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价