基于正交设计和粗糙集理论的地基极限承载力影响因素分析

张德永,王玉洲,张志豪,钱明

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9) : 118-122.

PDF(864 KB)
PDF(864 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9) : 118-122. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20140097
岩土工程

基于正交设计和粗糙集理论的地基极限承载力影响因素分析

  • 张德永,王玉洲,张志豪,钱明
作者信息 +

Factors Affecting the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Foundation Based on Orthogonal Design and Rough Set Theory

  • ZHANG De-yong, WANG Yu-zhou, ZHANG Zhi-hao, QIAN Ming
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于滇中高原某大型工程的统计数据,利用 ANSYS和FLAC3D建立了覆盖型岩溶发育区的典型溶洞模型,计算了岩石黏聚力和内摩擦角、抗拉强度、顶板厚度、高跨比、溶洞半径和基础宽度6种影响因素下的地基极限承载力,并总结其规律;利用正交分析和粗糙集理论,分析了这6种影响因素对地基极限承载力影响的大小。结果表明:顶板厚度和抗剪强度影响最大;溶洞半径、高跨比和基础宽度影响其次;顶板抗拉强度影响最小。

Abstract

According to the statistical data of a large-scale project in Yunnan Plateau, a typical karst cave model covered with clay was established by employing ANSYS and FLAC3D, and the ultimate bearing capacity of foundation was calculated and its regularities were summarized in the presence of varying cohesion, internal friction angle, tensile strength, thickness of roof, depth-span ratio, cave radius, and cave width. Furthermore, through orthogonal analysis and rough set theory, the influences of these factors on the ultimate bearing capacity of the foundation were analyzed. Results reveal that roof thickness and shear strength have the biggest influence on the ultimate bearing capacity, followed by cave radius, depth-span ratio and cave width, while tensile strength has the smallest impact.

关键词

覆盖型岩溶 / 地基极限承载力 / 数值分析 / 正交分析 / 粗糙集理论

Key words

covered karst / ultimate bearing capacity of foundation / numerical analysis / orthogonal analysis / rough set theory

引用本文

导出引用
张德永,王玉洲,张志豪,钱明. 基于正交设计和粗糙集理论的地基极限承载力影响因素分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2015, 32(9): 118-122 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20140097
ZHANG De-yong, WANG Yu-zhou, ZHANG Zhi-hao, QIAN Ming. Factors Affecting the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Foundation Based on Orthogonal Design and Rough Set Theory[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2015, 32(9): 118-122 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20140097
中图分类号: TU457   

参考文献

[1] 袁道先. 中国岩溶学[M].北京: 地质出版社, 1994.(YUAN Dao-xian. Karstology of China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1994. (in Chinese))
[2] 谭志宏. 岩溶区隐伏空洞对路桥工程稳定性影响的研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2008. (TAN Zhi-hong. Research on the Influence of Hidden Cave on the Stability of Road and Bridge Engineering in Karst Area[D]. Shenyang:Northeastern University, 2008.(in Chinese))
[3] 牛晶蕊. 唐山市长青楼小区岩溶地基稳定性评价方法[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2010. (NIU Jing-rui. Method for the Stability Estimation of the Karst Foundation of Construction Site in Tangshan[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2010.(in Chinese))
[4] 刘 辉,杨 峰,阳军生. 空洞上方浅基础地基破坏模式与极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(11):3373-3378. (LIU Hui, YANG Feng, YANG Jun-sheng. Failure Mechanism and Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing above Void[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010,31(11):3373- 3378. (in Chinese))
[5] 阳军生, 张 军, 张起森, 等. 溶洞上方圆形基础地基极限承载力有限元分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(2): 296-301. (YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Qi-sen, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Circular Footing above Karst Cave[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(2): 296-301.(in Chinese))
[6] 胡庆国, 张可能, 阳军生. 溶洞上方条形基础地基极限承载力有限元分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,36(4):694-697.(HU Qing-guo, ZHANG Ke-neng, YANG Jun-sheng. Finite Element Analysis of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing above Karst Cave[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2005, 36(4): 694-697.(in Chinese))
[7] 彭芳乐, 清住真, 高 伟, 等. 空洞的存在对浅基础承载力与沉降影响分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(6): 1123-1131. (PENG Fang-le, KIYOSUMI M, GAO Wei, et al. Study on Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Shallow Foundation with Void[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(6): 1123-1131. (in Chinese))
[8] 赵帅军.武广客运专线英德段厚覆盖型岩溶区土洞顶板稳定性研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.(ZHAO Shuai-jun. Study on Stability of Soil Cave Roof at Thick-covered Karst Zone in the Yingde Section of Passenger Dedicated Railway from Wuhan to Guangzhou[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2009.(in Chinese))
[9] 符策简. 岩溶地区隐伏溶洞顶板稳定性及变形分析[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(增2):288-291,296. (FU Ce-jian. Analysis on Roof Stability and Deformation of Concealed Cave in Karst Regions[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(Sup.2): 288-291, 296. (in Chinese))
[10]王建秀, 杨立中,刘 丹,等.覆盖型无充填溶洞薄顶板塌陷稳定研究[J].中国岩溶,2000,19(1):65-72. (WANG Jian-xiu, YANG Li-zhong, LIU Dan, et al. A Discussion on the Karst Collapse Evolution of the Karst Caves Covered with Thin Rocky Roof[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2000, 19(1): 65-72. (in Chinese))
[11]喻晓峰. 桩基下溶洞顶板稳定性多因素模拟分析[D].南宁:广西大学,2007. (YU Xiao-feng. Simulation Analysis of Multi-factors on the Karst Roof Stability under Pile Foundation[D]. Nanning:Guangxi University, 2007. (in Chinese))
[12]李仁江,盛 谦,张勇慧,等. 溶洞顶板极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学,2007,28(8):1621-1625, 1630.(LI Ren-jiang, SHENG Qian, ZHANG Yong-hui, et al. Study on Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Upper Rock Plate of Karst Cave[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(8):1621- 1625, 1630.(in Chinese))
[13]陈尚桥,黄润秋. 基础下浅埋洞室安全顶板厚度研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(增1):961-966. (CHEN Shang-qiao, HUANG Run-qiu. A Study on Safety Thickness of Shallow Buried Cavities under Foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2000,19 (Sup.1): 961-966. (in Chinese))
[14]JB/T 7510—1994, 中华人民共和国机械行业标准-工艺参数优化方法正交试验法[S]. (JB/T 7510—1994, Orthogonal Test Method for the Optimization of Technical Parameters[S]. (in Chinese))
[15]张文修,吴伟志,梁吉业,等. 粗糙集理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2001. (ZHANG Wen-xiu, WU Wei-zhi, LIANG Ji-ye, et al. Rough Set Theory and Method[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001. (in Chinese))
[16]张雪峰,张庆灵. 粗糙集数据分析系统MATLAB仿真工具箱设计[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,(1):40-43. (ZHANG Xue-feng, ZHANG Qing-ling. Design of MATLAB Simulation Tool Box for Rough Set Data Analysis System[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2007, (1): 40-43. (in Chinese))

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(41172230)

PDF(864 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map