院报 ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 115-121.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.03.020

• 工程应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

加筋土结构设计方法及设计安全冗余分析

Michael Dobie1, 何 波2   

  1. 1.坦萨国际有限公司, 英国布莱克本 BB1 2QX;
    2.坦萨国际设计咨询北京有限公司, 北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-13 修回日期:2014-03-07 出版日期:2014-03-07 发布日期:2014-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 何 波(1971-), 女, 重庆市人, 硕士, 主要从事土工合成材料应用方面的研究, (电话)010 -84871008(电子信箱)sindy@tensar.com.cn。
  • 作者简介:Michael Dobie(1951-), 男, 英国伦敦人, 英国注册土木工程师, 英国土木工程学会会员, 主要从事土工合成材料的研究, (电话)+62 (21)5490016(电子信箱) tensar@attglobal.net。

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls: An Outline of Design Methods and Sources of Conservatism

Michael Dobie1, Sindy He2   

  1. 1. Tensar International Ltd., Blackburn BB1 2QX, UK; 2. Tensar International Design & Consult Beijing Ltd, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2013-11-13 Revised:2014-03-07 Online:2014-03-07 Published:2014-03-07

摘要: 在加筋土结构设计中, 为减少安全冗余, 节省造价, 可以从计算方法、材料参数和系数这3方面着手考虑。①计算方法, 如果在太多的假设条件下进行, 很容易造成设计保守。可以通过采用更接近实际的计算模式, 充分利用加筋材料, 同时确定一些薄弱点来尽可能减小安全冗余。②材料参数包括土体参数、加筋材料参数, 以及两者之间的相互作用系数。采用排水条件下的土体强度测试方法很重要。加筋材料的强度需要经过正确的加速试验方法, 确定在设计年限中的强度值, 并考虑在这个过程中导致强度衰减的各种因素。③设计采用的系数, 有的是考虑不确定性, 有的是要确保一个安全的结构, 还有的是要确保在设计年限范围内有充分的可靠度。因此在加筋土结构设计中减小安全冗余, 主要应该从计算方法着手, 并且对土样进行适合的抗剪强度试验, 得到可靠的强度值。另外在设计中还有许多的系数可以选取和调整。当设计的结构节省大量加筋材料时, 应该进行使用状态下的验算, 确保加筋材料的工后应变不会超过限值。

关键词: 加筋土, 计算方法, 材料参数, 系数, 安全冗余

Abstract: Design methods for reinforced soil retaining walls consist of three main elements: method of calculation, material parameters and safety factors. Each of these is considered in turn to examine where conservatism may exist, so that there is scope for reducing the cost of a structure. The method of calculation, especially for internal stability, may result in considerable conservatism if many assumptions are required to carry out the calculation. This can be minimised by using more realistic methods of calculation, which make optimum use of the reinforcement, but at the same time identify the effects of any weak points (for example low connection strength between reinforcement and facing). Material properties are required for the fill soils, the reinforcement and the interaction between the two. Soil tests are required to define the fill shear strength and unit weight. The drained soil shear strength is required, therefore it is most important that the correct soil test procedures are used, especially for finer soils (quick undrained tests are not suitable). The reinforcement strength must be determined as suitable for the full design life of the structure, taking into account that degradation continues throughout its service life, but this must be assessed using accelerated test methods. Any idea of switching to a definition of reinforcement strength based on short term strength would be most unwise, resulting in a structure of unknown long term performance and inadequate serviceability. As regards the factors used, these are defined partly to take into account uncertainties, partly to ensure a safe structure and partly to ensure adequate serviceability during the life of the structure. With regards to reducing conservatism in reinforced soil design methods, the main elements to be considered are the method of calculation, and ensuring that appropriate and adequate shear strength testing is carried out on the fill material. There is also scope for choosing suitable factors. If design methods are developed to achieve less conservatism compared to current methods, then it is important that serviceability checks are included to ensure that post-construction strain in the reinforcement is not excessive.

Key words: reinforced soil, calculation method, material properties, factor, conservatism

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map