raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 212-222.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250149

• 水库群多目标优化调度研究专栏 • 上一篇    

雅砻江梯级水库汛控水位多目标优化调度

何彦锋1,2(), 贾子航1, 黄康康1, 周研来1(), 陈华1, 郭生练1   

  1. 1 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,武汉 430072
    2 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,成都 611130
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-26 修回日期:2025-05-13 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-09-01
  • 通信作者:
    周研来(1985-),男,湖南娄底人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事水库群调度研究。E-mail:
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC3200303)

Multi-objective Optimization of Flood Control Water Level Scheduling for Cascade Reservoirs in Yalong River Basin

HE Yan-feng1,2(), JIA Zi-hang1, HUANG Kang-kang1, ZHOU Yan-lai1(), CHEN Hua1, GUO Sheng-lian1   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Engineering and Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China
    2 Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu 611130, China
  • Received:2025-02-26 Revised:2025-05-13 Published:2025-09-01 Online:2025-09-01

摘要:

气候变化和强人类活动使得水旱灾害频发,优化水库汛控水位调度是应对极端水旱灾害的重要技术手段。以雅砻江梯级水库为研究对象,基于流域洪水特性及3座控制性水库的设计洪水,构建梯级水库汛控水位多目标优化调度模型,采用非支配排序遗传算法求解模型得到Pareto解集,并运用基于熵权法的多准则妥协解排序法推求最佳汛控水位方案。结果表明:通过优化调度,在不增加防洪风险的前提下,雅砻江流域两河口、锦屏一级和二滩水库的汛控水位可分别抬升2.54~4.98、0.7~1.77、2.13~2.96 m。20240429场次洪水的实例分析表明,相较于实际调度结果,最佳汛控水位方案可使雅砻江梯级水库总发电量增加2.55亿kW·h(改善率为9.7%),且调洪高水位更低,充分发挥了水库洪水资源调控能力,显著提升了梯级水库综合效益。

关键词: 梯级水库, 防洪调度, 汛控水位, 多目标优化, 雅砻江流域

Abstract:

[Objective] Optimizing the scheduling of flood control water levels in reservoirs has become a key technical approach to cope with extreme flood and drought disasters. Focusing on the challenges of unclear allocation efficiency of reservoir capacity and hierarchical scheduling of water levels for flood control in the cascade reservoirs of the Yalong River Basin, we established a multi-objective scheduling model for flood control water levels of cascade reservoirs, aiming to achieve coordinated scheduling of both flood control and beneficial utilization goals. [Methods] The study focused on three key control reservoirs—Lianghekou, Jinping I, and Ertan—in the Yalong River Basin, and used flood hydrographs derived from typical flood events in 1965 and 2000 under different design frequencies (P=1%, 0.5%, 0.2%, and 0.1%) as input data. The objective functions of the proposed model include: minimizing the peak discharge at the outlet cross-section, minimizing the water level at the end of the scheduling period, minimizing the highest water level during the scheduling period, and minimizing the total utilized flood control reservoir capacity, while considering constraints such as water balance, discharge capacity, and upper and lower water level limits. The model was solved using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to generate the Pareto solution set, and the entropy-weighted VIKOR method (EMW-VIKOR) was used to rank and select the optimal scheduling schemes. [Results] (1) Significant trade-off among the objectives existed. The peak flood discharge at the outlet cross-section of the river basin showed a clear competitive relationship with the water level recovery rate of upstream reservoirs at the end of the scheduling period, the maximum water level during the scheduling period, and the total utilized flood control reservoir capacity. Analysis of flood control reservoir capacity allocation indicated that as the flood magnitude increased, the allocated flood control capacity of Jinping I increased, the total utilized flood control capacity of cascade reservoirs decreased, and the peak discharge affecting downstream protected areas decreased. (2) The optimal flood control water level schemes were obtained after comparison and selection. For Lianghekou Reservoir, the flood control water level could be raised from 2 845.9 m to 2 848.44-2 850.88 m, an increase of 2.5-5 m. For Jinping I Reservoir, from 1 859.06 m to 1 859.76-1 860.83 m, an increase of 0.7-1.8 m. The flood control water level of Ertan Reservoir could be raised from 1 190 m to 1 192.13-1 192.96 m, an increase of 2-3 m. (3) The optimized scheduling schemes demonstrated significant comprehensive benefits. Compared with conventional scheduling schemes, the error in reservoir water level recovery rate at the end of the scheduling period was less than 0.5% under different design frequencies. The highest water level indicator approached 1 (e.g., 0.997 9 at P=0.1%) without exceeding flood control upper limits. The utilized flood control reservoir capacity was reduced by 300 million m3 or more, including a reduction of 566 million m3 under the design frequency of P=1%. Taking the flood event on July 29, 2024 as an example, the optimal scheme increased power generation by 255 million kW·h (an improvement rate of 9.7%) compared with the actual scheduling, while achieving a lower peak flood control water level and a water level recovery rate of 100% at the end of the flood season, demonstrating significant improvements in both flood control and beneficial utilization. [Conclusion] This study proposes a multi-objective optimization model for flood control water level scheduling in cascade reservoirs, reveals the allocation efficiency of flood control reservoir capacity, and provides a multi-objective coordinated scheduling scheme for flood control water levels of cascade reservoirs. The findings provide technical support for floodwater resource scheduling of cascade reservoirs in the Yalong River Basin and enhance the utilization level of water resources in the river basin.

Key words: cascade reservoirs, flood control scheduling, flood control water level, multi-objective optimization, Yalong River Basin

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map