raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 153-161.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240661

• 水工结构与材料 • 上一篇    下一篇

大体积混凝土上下层温差监控方法探讨

黄耀英1(), 付雨晨1, 庄维1,2, 涂月彤1, 胡昱3   

  1. 1 三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002
    2 中国长江三峡集团有限公司流域枢纽运行管理中心,湖北 宜昌 443002
    3 清华大学 水圈科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-24 修回日期:2024-11-14 出版日期:2025-08-01 发布日期:2025-08-01
  • 作者简介:

    黄耀英(1977-),男,湖南郴州人,教授,博士,主要从事水工程安全监控、数值计算及长效服役试验研究工作。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(52239009); 国家自然科学基金项目(52179135)

Discussion on Monitoring Methods for the Temperature Difference Between Upper and Lower Layers of Mass Concrete

HUANG Yao-ying1(), FU Yu-chen1, ZHUANG Wei1,2, TU Yue-tong1, HU Yu3   

  1. 1 College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering,China Three Gorges University,Yichang 443002,China
    2 River Basin Complex Administration Center of China Three Gorges Corporation,Yichang 443002,China
    3 State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2024-06-24 Revised:2024-11-14 Published:2025-08-01 Online:2025-08-01

摘要:

针对现有规范关于大体积混凝土上下层温差的定义不便于计算和现场监控的问题,基于计算方式和监控指标相配套的原则,首先设计了4种上下层温差的计算方式,然后结合不同间歇期大体积混凝土温度场和徐变应力场仿真计算结果,获得不同计算方式下混凝土上下层最大温差和最大拉应力样本,进而确定最大拉应力样本的概率密度函数,并基于混凝土容许拉应力计算获得最大拉应力失效概率,最后通过确定上下层最大温差样本的概率密度函数,提出一种上下层容许温差拟定方法。结合某大型船闸工程进行了上下层温差分析,拟定了4种不同计算方式下的上下层容许温差,建议采取便于现场监控的上下层温差计算方式,现场上下层温差试验验证了提出方法的可行性。

关键词: 大体积混凝土, 上下层温差, 计算方式, 失效概率, 拉应力

Abstract:

[Objectives] When constructing concrete hydraulic projects in cold and high-altitude regions, or when promoting interconnection of water networks through the construction of concrete-based backbone projects such as sluices, ship locks, and pumping stations, long intervals in concrete pouring are inevitable, and the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers of concrete becomes a key concern. Although the upper-lower temperature difference, the allowable foundation temperature difference, and the internal-external temperature difference are three important temperature control indicators in the thermal control and crack prevention of mass concrete, the vague or overly theoretical definition of the upper-lower temperature difference makes its calculation inconvenient and monitoring difficult to implement effectively, making it hard to apply this indicator in actual construction. Therefore, effectively addressing the calculation and monitoring of the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers of concrete is of urgent engineering significance. [Methods] Based on existing definitions of the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers and considering the operability of monitoring, this study proposed four calculation methods following the principle of matching “calculation method-monitoring index”. These methods are based respectively on the “temperature within the geometric vertical centerline range” and the “temperature within the overall influence range” of the upper and lower pouring segments. Through simulating the temperature field and creep stress field of mass concrete with different interval durations, samples of maximum tensile stress in concrete and samples of upper-lower temperature differences under different interval conditions were obtained. Subsequently, statistical tests were conducted on the above samples to derive the corresponding probability density distribution functions of the maximum tensile stress and temperature difference between upper and lower layers. Then, the failure probability of the maximum tensile stress was determined based on the allowable tensile stress of concrete. Finally, assuming that the failure probabilities of the maximum tensile stress and temperature difference between upper and lower layers were equal, the allowable temperature differences between the upper and lower layers of concrete corresponding to the four calculation methods were proposed. [Results] Based on the concrete pouring of the bottom slab-guide angle section of a large ship lock, simulation calculations of the temperature field and creep stress field of mass concrete were carried out for different seasons (spring, summer, autumn, and winter) and various interval durations (30 to 180 days). According to the proposed method for determining the allowable temperature difference between upper and lower layers, four allowable temperature differences were derived: 29.14 ℃, 19.95 ℃, 20.29 ℃, and 18.02 ℃, respectively. These values showed some deviations from the currently recommended range of 15-20 ℃ in existing standards. [Conclusions] Because the calculation methods correspond to their respective monitoring indicators, different approaches to calculating the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers result in significant differences in the allowable temperature differences. Considering the operability of on-site monitoring, it is recommended to use the calculation method based on the “temperature within the geometric vertical centerline range of the upper and lower pouring segments” and its corresponding monitoring indicator to monitor the temperature difference between upper and lower layers of mass concrete on site.

Key words: mass concrete, temperature difference between upper and lower layer, calculation method, failure probability, tensile stress

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map