滨海城市洪涝风险评估——以上海临港新城为例

陈丽慧, 陈洁, 高郭平

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 84-93.

PDF(9346 KB)
PDF(9346 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 84-93. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240575
水灾害

滨海城市洪涝风险评估——以上海临港新城为例

作者信息 +

Flood Risk Assessment in Coastal Cities: A Case Study of Lingang New City, Shanghai

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

开展滨海城市洪涝灾害风险评估,对滨海城市加强灾害风险管理、降低灾害负面影响具有重要的意义。已开展的研究对上海市中心城区的洪涝风险已经取得了较好的进展,但是对于上海市郊区特别是位于东南沿海的临港新片区的研究还有待进一步深入,且评估存在缺乏全面性及精度较低的问题,所以需要进一步明确。基于指标体系法,以上海市临港新片区为例,从致灾因子危险性、孕灾环境暴露度和承灾体脆弱性3个方面选取9个指标,构建30 m×30 m的栅格评估单元,通过层次分析法和熵权法确定指标权重,利用ArcGIS对研究区进行精细化的暴雨洪涝灾害综合风险评估。结果表明:上海市临港新片区洪涝灾害风险主要受脆弱性、暴露度的影响,综合风险等级面积占比分别为10.34%的高风险区、17.97%的较高风险区、27.59%的中风险区、27.03%的较低风险区和17.07%的低风险区,风险总体呈东南部最高、中部城镇地区次之、中西部农村地区较低的空间分布形态。

Abstract

[Objective] Flood disaster risk assessment for coastal cities is crucial for improving the resilience of new urban planning and disaster emergency management capabilities. This study focuses on the issues in existing research on flood risk assessment in coastal new towns, such as incomplete indicator systems and insufficient spatial analysis accuracy. Taking Lingang New City in Shanghai as the study area, this study conducted a detailed comprehensive flood disaster risk assessment to provide a scientific basis and decision support for disaster risk management, emergency response, and urban planning. [Methods] Following the principles of scientific rigor and operability, a three-dimensional assessment model was established integrating the hazard of disaster-inducing factors, the exposure of disaster-prone environments, and the vulnerability of disaster-bearing bodies. A high-resolution grid unit of 30m × 30m was innovatively adopted, and a combined subjective-objective weighting approach was used by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the entropy weight method. Through spatial overlay analysis, a refined flood disaster risk assessment was achieved. [Results] (1) Hazard distribution: Due to the limited and relatively uniform distribution of rainfall sampling points, rainfall indicators in the study area were regarded as homogeneously distributed. Therefore, the spatial variation in the hazard of disaster-inducing factors was mainly determined by river network density. (2) Exposure distribution: High and relatively high exposure areas were mainly located near towns and streets, where the proportion of impervious surfaces was high, and both vegetation coverage and terrain elevation were relatively low. Low and relatively low exposure areas were widely distributed in suburban and rural areas. (3) Vulnerability distribution: High and relatively high vulnerability areas were concentrated in Pudong New Area, especially around Nicheng Town and Dishui Lake, where GDP per unit area and population density were relatively high. Fengxian District showed comparatively lower vulnerability. (4) Comprehensive risk distribution: The spatial distribution of comprehensive flood risk levels in Lingang New Area was relatively balanced, with high-risk areas accounting for 10.34%, relatively high-risk areas 17.97%, medium-risk areas 27.59%, relatively low-risk areas 27.03%, and low-risk areas 17.07%. Spatially, there were significant regional disparities. The southeastern coastal region (e.g., Nanhui New Town and its surroundings) had the highest risk, followed by central town areas (e.g., Nicheng Town, Shuyuan Town), while the central-western rural areas had the lowest risk. [Conclusion] The proposed “three-dimensional nine-indicator” assessment framework overcomes the limitation of separating subjective and objective weights in traditional risk assessments. The constructed flood risk indicator system can provide a replicable risk governance paradigm for China and other rapidly developing coastal cities.

关键词

风险评估 / 洪涝灾害 / 层次分析法 / 熵权法 / 临港新片区

Key words

risk assessment / flood disaster / analytic hierarchy process / entropy weight method / Lingang New Area

引用本文

导出引用
陈丽慧, 陈洁, 高郭平. 滨海城市洪涝风险评估——以上海临港新城为例[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2025, 42(8): 84-93 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240575
CHEN Li-hui, CHEN Jie, GAO Guo-ping. Flood Risk Assessment in Coastal Cities: A Case Study of Lingang New City, Shanghai[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(8): 84-93 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240575
中图分类号: TV211 (水利调查)    X43 (自然灾害及其防治)   

参考文献

[1]
AFFAIRS U N O F D. Human Cost of Disasters[M]. Geneva: United Nations, 2020.
[2]
傅永超, 朱宇蓉, 马俊卿. 基于GIS的海北州祁连县暴雨灾害风险评估[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2022, 12(10): 49-51.
(FU Yong-chao, ZHU Yu-rong, MA Jun-qing. Risk Assessment of Rainstorm Disaster in Qilian County, Haibei Prefecture Based on GIS[J]. Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology, 2022, 12(10): 49-51.(in Chinese))
[3]
张建云, 王银堂, 贺瑞敏, 等. 中国城市洪涝问题及成因分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2016, 27(4): 485-491.
(ZHANG Jian-yun, WANG Yin-tang, HE Rui-min, et al. Discussion on the Urban Flood and Waterlogging and Causes Analysis in China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016, 27(4): 485-491.(in Chinese))
[4]
徐宗学, 程涛. 城市水管理与海绵城市建设之理论基础: 城市水文学研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2019, 50(1): 53-61.
(XU Zong-xue, CHENG Tao. Basic Theory for Urban Water Management and Sponge City—Review on Urban Hydrology[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 50(1): 53-61.(in Chinese))
[5]
夏骥. 上海郊区新城的历史演变与未来发展[J]. 科学发展, 2020(11): 47-56.
(XIA Ji. The Historical Evolution and Future Development of Shanghai’s Suburban New Town[J]. Scientific Development, 2020(11): 47-56. ) (in Chinese)
[6]
方建, 李梦婕, 王静爱, 等. 全球暴雨洪水灾害风险评估与制图[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2015, 24(1): 1-8.
(FANG Jian, LI Meng-jie, WANG Jing-ai, et al. Assessment and Mapping of Global Fluvial Flood Risk[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2015, 24(1): 1-8.(in Chinese))
[7]
王仲梅, 仝逸峰, 荆新爱. 黄河下游洪灾风险的定量分析与计算[J]. 人民黄河, 2013, 35(1): 14-16.
(WANG Zhong-mei, TONG Yi-feng, JING Xin-ai. Quantitative Analysis and Computation on Flood Risk of the Lower Yellow River Floodplain[J]. Yellow River, 2013, 35(1): 14-16.(in Chinese))
[8]
王泽雨, 李建章. 基于遥感与GIS的江西省洪涝灾害评估研究[J]. 时空信息学报, 2023, 30(4): 595-604.
(WANG Ze-yu, LI Jian-zhang. Flood Disaster Assessment in Jiangxi Province Based on Remote Sensing and GIS[J]. Journal of Spatio-Temporal Information, 2023, 30(4): 595-604.(in Chinese))
[9]
李想. 基于遥感和GIS的盘锦市洪涝灾害风险评估研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2023.
(LI Xiang. Study on Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster in Panjin City Based on Remote Sensing and GIS[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2023.(in Chinese))
[10]
熊凡. 基于GIS和RS的江西省洪涝灾害风险评估研究[D]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2023.
(XIONG Fan. Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster in Jiangxi Province Based on GIS and RS[D]. Ganzhou: Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2023.(in Chinese))
[11]
赵金彬. 基于层次分析-熵权法的洪涝风险评估: 以黄河山东段为例[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2023, 13(19): 78-81.
(ZHAO Jin-bin. Flood Risk Assessment Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-entropy Weight Method—Taking Shandong Section of the Yellow River as an Example[J]. Technology Innovation and Application, 2023, 13(19): 78-81.(in Chinese))
[12]
杨柳, 冯畅, 郭哿, 等. 基于四维度模型的湖南省湘江流域洪涝灾害风险评估[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2024, 35(1): 26-36.
(YANG Liu, FENG Chang, GUO Ge, et al. Assessment of Flood Disaster Risk Based on a Four-dimensional Model in Hunan Section of the Xiangjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2024, 35(1): 26-36.(in Chinese))
[13]
姜涛, 李宁. 基于GIS-AHP集成的陕西省暴雨洪涝灾害风险评估[J]. 黑龙江水利科技, 2024, 52(1): 85-88.
(JIANG Tao, LI Ning. Risk Assessment of Rainstorm and Flood Disaster in Shaan’xi Province Based on GIS-AHP Integration[J]. Heilongjiang Hydraulic Science and Technology, 2024, 52(1): 85-88.(in Chinese))
[14]
WANG Y, LIU G, GUO E, et al. Quantitative Agricultural Flood Risk Assessment Using Vulnerability Surface and Copula Functions[J]. Water, 2018, 10(9): 1229.
[15]
黄国如, 李碧琦. 基于模糊综合评价的深圳市暴雨洪涝风险评估[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2021, 32(1): 1-6.
(HUANG Guo-ru, LI Bi-qi. Risk Assessment of Storm Water Fooding in Shenzhen City Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2021, 32(1): 1-6.(in Chinese))
[16]
冯刚, 黄强, 方伟, 等. 珠江流域浔江防洪保护区洪灾风险评估[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2024, 41(7): 79-86, 93.
摘要
洪水灾害具有发生频率高、破坏性强的特点,风险评估可揭示高风险热点区及其驱动因素,有助于科学、高效构建防洪减灾体系。以珠江流域浔江防洪保护区为研究对象,构建HEC-RAS水动力模型,提取最大流速、水深评估洪水危险性;利用层次分析法和熵权法,考虑人口密度、国内生产总值(GDP)和土地利用等要素,评估承灾体的暴露度和脆弱性;最后计算洪灾风险,分析洪灾风险时空动态变化。结果表明:水动力模型的平均命中率达0.80以上,误报率低于0.28;在浔江防洪保护区内,中高风险区占5.20%以上;1997—2017年间,不同等级的洪水风险均呈加剧趋势,值得警惕的是中高风险区近46.69%区域风险上升趋势显著。研究成果可为科学高效的洪灾风险管理提供决策支持。
(FENG Gang, HUANG Qiang, FANG Wei, et al. Flood Risk Assessment of Xunjiang Flood Control Protection Area in the Pearl River Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(7): 79-86, 93.(in Chinese))
[17]
王京晶, 徐宗学, 李福林, 等. 济南市主城区城市洪涝风险分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(1): 22-26.
(WANG Jing-jing, XU Zong-xue, LI Fu-lin, et al. Urban Flooding/Waterlogging Risk Analysis in the Downtown Area of Jinan City[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2024, 42(1): 22-26.(in Chinese))
[18]
吴辉明, 陈文龙, 杨芳, 等. 深圳龙岗区2023年“9·7”极端特大暴雨洪涝灾害风险评估与对策[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34(1):36-40.
(WU Hui-ming, CHEN Wen-long, YANG Fang, et al. Risk Assessment and Countermeasures of Flood and Waterlogging Caused by “9·7” Extreme Heavy Rainstorm in Longgang District of Shenzhen City in 2023[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2024, 34(1):36-40.(in Chinese))
[19]
LÖWE R, URICH C, DOMINGO N S, et al. Assessment of Urban Pluvial Flood Risk and Efficiency of Adaptation Options through Simulations:A New Generation of Urban Planning Tools[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 550: 355-367.
[20]
ZISCHG A P, MOSIMANN M, BERNET D B, et al. Validation of 2D Flood Models with Insurance Claims[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 557: 350-361.
[21]
程卫帅, 陈进, 刘丹. 洪灾风险评估方法研究综述[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2010, 27(9): 17-24.
(CHENG Wei-shuai, CHEN Jin, LIU Dan. Review on Flood Risk Assessment[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2010, 27(9): 17-24.(in Chinese))
[22]
史培军. 三论灾害研究的理论与实践[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2002, 11(3): 1-9.
(SHI Pei-jun. Theory on Disaster Science and Disaster Dynamics[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2002, 11(3): 1-9.(in Chinese))
[23]
邵强, 李友俊, 田庆旺. 综合评价指标体系构建方法[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2004, 28(3): 74-76, 105-123.
(SHAO Qiang, LI You-jun, TIAN Qing-wang. Establishment of Integrated Evaluation Index System[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2004, 28(3): 74-76, 105-123.(in Chinese))
[24]
林美霞. 基于海绵城市建设的厦门城市暴雨内涝灾害风险研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2017.
(LIN Mei-xia. Study on the Risk of Rainstorm Waterlogging Disaster in Xiamen Based on the Construction of Sponge City[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2017.(in Chinese))
[25]
黄国如, 陈易偲. 高度城镇化背景下珠三角地区城市洪涝风险变化特征[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2021, 31(11):7-13.
(HUANG Guo-ru, CHEN Yi-si. Variation Characteristics of Urban Flood Risk in the Pearl River Delta under Dense Urbanization[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2021, 31(11): 7-13.(in Chinese))
[26]
曹罗丹. 基于遥感与GIS的浙江省洪涝灾害风险评估研究[D]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2014.
(CAO Luo-dan. Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster in Zhejiang Province Based on Remote Sensing and GIS[D]. Ningbo: Ningbo University, 2014.(in Chinese))
[27]
孙阿丽. 基于情景模拟的城市暴雨内涝风险评估[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2011.
(SUN A-li. Risk Assessment of Urban Rainstorm Waterlogging Based on Scenario Simulation[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2011.(in Chinese))
[28]
史培军. 灾害风险科学[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社,2016:1-551.
(SHI Pei-jun. Disaster Risk Science[M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press,2016:1-551.(in Chinese))
[29]
曹罗丹, 李加林. 基于遥感与GIS的浙江省洪涝灾害综合风险评估研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2015, 24(4): 111-119.
(CAO Luo-dan, LI Jia-lin. Integrated Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster in Zhejiang Province Based on RS and GIS[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2015, 24(4): 111-119.(in Chinese))
[30]
廖春贵, 熊小菊, 胡宝清. 基于GIS的广西暴雨洪涝灾害的时空特征与脆弱性评价[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 23(5): 29-33.
(LIAO Chun-gui, XIONG Xiao-ju, HU Bao-qing. Spatial-Temporal Distribution and Vulnerability Assessment of Flood Disaster in Guangxi Based on GIS[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 23(5): 29-33.(in Chinese))
[31]
冯凌彤. 基于RS和GIS的郑州市洪涝灾害风险评估研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2020.
(FENG Ling-tong. Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster in Zhengzhou City Based on RS and GIS[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2020.(in Chinese))
[32]
邵佳丽, 郑伟. 洪涝灾害危险性评估方法研究[J]. 灾害学, 2018, 33(2): 58-63.
(SHAO Jia-li, ZHENG Wei. Study on the Flood Hazard Assessment Method[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2018, 33(2): 58-63.(in Chinese))
[33]
罗海婉. 城市洪涝灾害风险评估方法及其应用研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
(LUO Hai-wan. Study on Risk Assessment Method of Urban Flood Disaster and Its Application[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020.(in Chinese))
[34]
SAATY T L. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15(3): 234-281.
[35]
殷杰, 尹占娥, 于大鹏, 等. 基于情景的上海台风风暴潮淹没模拟研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(1):110-115.
摘要
台风风暴潮是上海地区面临的主要自然灾害类型,历史上对该区域造成了极为严重的灾害损失。通过上海沿海多站点水文频率分析结果发现,由于高标准海塘的防护,上海发生风暴潮漫堤淹没的几率较小。在此基础上,构建了两处溃堤点6种重现期台风风暴潮溃堤情景,采用高精度洪水数值模型(FloodMap)开展台风风暴潮淹没情景模拟。结果显示,溃堤情景下,风暴潮淹没仅发生在局部小范围区域内。因此,可以认为在目前高标准海塘的保护下,上海受台风风暴潮灾害影响有限。但是,未来需重点关注全球气候变化可能导致的极端台风风暴潮事件。
(YIN Jie, YIN Zhan-e, YU Da-peng, et al. Flood Simulation Study of Typhoon Storm Surge Based on Scenarios in Shanghai[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(1):110-115.(in Chinese))

Storm surges from tropical cyclones, as one of the most devastating natural hazards in Shanghai, have caused considerable personal injury and property damage in the history. A scenario-based study that investigated the storm induced flood potentials in Shanghai coastal area was conducted. Based on the probability analysis for several gauge stations, the findings show that due to the high standard seawall, it is less likely to occur overtopping inundation in the short term. Therefore, two vulnerable sections of seawall and six kinds of storm surge barrier bursts scenarios were built. Comparing the local land elevation with the flood levels of different return periods, flood scenarios with return periods of 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 and 1000 years were designed to cover the probable situations. The shape of the flow hydrographs at the boundary gauging stations for various return periods was derived based on 9711 typhoon induced flood event where hourly flow boundary conditions were available. To reduce the computational costs of the simulation, the design flood scenarios were represented with 20 hours tidal hydrographs, which include two rising phases and two falling limbs. The topographic contours (0.5 m intervals) of Shanghai were interpolated to generate a DEM with a grid cell resolution of 50 m. These provided the flow and topographic boundary conditions for the model simulations. A well-established 2D flood numerical model (FloodMap) was used to predict the flood dynamics and inundation process. Subsequent analysis using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) was employed to illustrate the spatial and temporal distribution of flood-prone areas under different scenarios. The results indicated that, 1) maximum inundation depths were reached in all simulations at approximately the second to third hour, decreasing afterwards as the stage recedes. 2) Inundation area for each scenario increased throughout the simulation, even during the receding limb of the hydrograph. 3) The maximum inundation extents and depths increased with the increasing return periods. 4) Flooding from levee breach only caused local inundation. It can be concluded that the impact of storm flooding was not particularly high in Shanghai at present situation with the protection of high standard dike systems. However, extreme events caused by global climate change should be considered in future studies.

[36]
尹占娥, 许世远, 殷杰, 等. 基于小尺度的城市暴雨内涝灾害情景模拟与风险评估[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(5):553-562.
(YIN Zha-ne, XU Shi-yuan, YIN Jie, et al. Small-scale Based Scenario Modeling and Disaster Risk Assessment of Urban Rainstorm Water-logging[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(5):553-562.(in Chinese))

Scenario modeling and risk assessment of natural disaster is one of the hotspots of disaster research. However, urban natural disaster risk assessment, so far, is lack of common procedures and program. This paper selects rainstorm water-logging as research disaster, which is one of the most frequent occurring hazards in most cities of China, and sets up a small-scale based integrated methodology for hazards risk assessment of rainstorm water-logging, taking Jing\'an District in Shanghai as an example. Based on the basic concept of disaster risk, this paper applies scenario modeling to express the risk of the small-scale urban rainstorm water-logging disasters in different return periods. Through the analysis of hazards, vulnerability and exposure, we simulate different disaster scenarios and propose a comprehensive analysis method and procedure for the small-scale urban storm water-logging disaster risk assessment. A grid-based GIS approach, including urban terrain model, urban rainfall model, urban rainfall model and urban drainage model, was applied to simulate inundation area and depth. And then, stage-damage curves for residential buildings and contents were generated by the loss data of water-logging from the field surveys and the insurance company, which were further applied to analyze the vulnerability, exposure and loss assessment. Finally, the exceedance probability curve for disaster damage was constructed by using the damages of each simulated event and its respective exceedance probabilities. A framework was also developed for coupling the water-logging risk with the risk planning and management through exceedance probability curve and annual average of water-logging loss. And this is a new exploration for small-scale urban natural disaster scenario simulation and risk assessment.

[37]
景垠娜. 自然灾害风险评估:以上海浦东新区暴雨洪涝灾害为例[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2010.
(JING Yin-na. Risk Assessment of Natural Disasters: A Case Study of Storm and Flood in Pudong New Area, Shanghai[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2010.(in Chinese))
[38]
费璇. 基于社区的暴雨内涝灾害风险分析和管理:以上海市嘉定区江桥镇为例[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2015.
(FEI Xuan. Risk Analysis and Management of Storm Waterlogging Disaster Based on Community:A Case Study of Jiangqiao Town, Jiading District, Shanghai[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2015.(in Chinese))

基金

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(42301087)
上海市青年科技英才扬帆计划项目(23YF1416400)
上海海洋大学青年教师科研启动基金项目(A2-2006-25-200307)

编辑: 王 慰
PDF(9346 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map