长江源地处青藏高原腹地,水体环境特殊,关于源区间浮游植物特征差异及环境作用因子尚不清晰。对比了2012—2016年长江三源浮游植物特征,并采用主成分分析(PCA)、典范对应分析(CCA)揭示了浮游植物特征与13种环境因子间的关系。结果表明:隐藻门仅在南源当曲被发现,长江南源样点的浮游植物平均种类数最多,为18种,长江北源最少,为9种;北源的浮游植物平均密度最大,为37.70×104 ind/L,南源平均密度最小,为28.90×104 ind/L;长江南源的浮游植物平均生物多样性指数最高,达到3.04,北源平均生物多样性指数最低,为1.84;长江源区总体上浮游植物密度较低,水体处于贫营养状态。各源环境因子PCA结果显示:第一轴主要成分(71.23%)可解释为总氮、电导率,主要代表了河流营养物特征;第二轴主要成分(28.77%)可解释为海拔、床沙中值粒径、水温、含沙量和化学需氧量,主要代表河流生境状况。物种和主要环境因子CCA结果表明蓝藻门种类数与总氮、隐藻门种类数与海拔和床沙中值粒径,绿藻门种类数与海拔、化学需氧量和床沙中值粒径均呈明显的正响应关系,隐藻门和绿藻门种类数和含沙量、水温呈明显的负响应关系。
Abstract
Located in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, the headwaters of the Yangtze River features with specific water environment due to harsh weather conditions. Differences in the characteristics of phytoplankton in the headwaters and their interaction with environmental factors are still unclear. By comparing the characteristics of phytoplankton in the headwaters of the Yangtze River in 2012-2016, we revealed the relations between phytoplankton characteristics and thirteen environmental factors through principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Our findings unveiled that Cryptophyta only appeared in Dangqu. The southern source of the Yangtze River boasted the largest number of average phytoplankton species (18 species), and the northern source the smallest, only 9 species. In terms of average density of phytoplankton, however, the northern source had the largest, up to 37.70×104 ind/L, while the southern source the least, 28.90×104 ind/L. The average biodiversity index of phytoplankton in the southern source of the Yangtze River was the highest, reaching 3.04, while that of the northern source was the lowest, merely 1.84. In general, the headwaters of the Yangtze River had a relatively low density of phytoplankton, indicating that the water bodies in the headwaters were all in an oligotrophic state. PCA result of various environmental factors showed that the main components of the first axis (71.23%) could be interpreted as total nitrogen and electrical conductivity, which mainly represented the characteristics of river nutrients, while the main components of the second axis (28.77%) were interpreted as altitude, median particle diameter of bed sand, water temperature, sand content and chemical oxygen demand, mainly representing river habitat conditions. In the meantime, the results of CCA illustrated positive relations between the number of Cyanophyta species and total nitrogen, between the number of Cryptophyta species and altitude and median sand diameter, between the number of Chlorophyta species and altitude, as well as between chemical oxygen demand and median sand diameter. The number of Cryptophyta species and Chlorophyta species stayed in negative relation with sand concentration and water temperature.
关键词
长江三源 /
浮游植物群落特征差异 /
环境因子 /
主成分分析 /
典范对应分析
Key words
headwaters of the Yangtze River /
difference in characteristics of phytoplankton community /
environmental factors /
principal component analysis /
canonical correspondence analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 夏鹏章. 《长江志·水系》篇编撰记述[J]. 长江志季刊, 2003(2):41-45.
[2] 陈 进. 长江源—当曲水系及其生态系统特征探讨[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2014. 31(10):1-6.
[3] 徐 平, 李其江, 黄 茁,等. 长江和澜沧江源区生态环境综合科学考察:2012~2016[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2018.
[4] 韩 谞,潘保柱,赵耿楠,等.长江源区浮游植物群落结构及分布特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(11):2621-2631.
[5] ZHAO L,LI W,LIN L,et al. Field Investigation on River Hydrochemical Characteristics and Larval and Juvenile Fish in the Source Region of the Yangtze River[J]. Water, 2019, 11: 1342.
[6] 殷大聪, 许继军, 金 燕,等. 长江源与澜沧江源区浮游植物组成与分布特性研究[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2017,34(1): 61-66.
[7] 崔玉香, 张 静, 柴元冰,等. 长江源区浮游植物群落特征研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020,43(1):20-25.
[8] 陈燕琴. 澜沧江囊谦段夏秋季浮游植物群落结构初步研究[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2012, 33(3):60-67.
[9] 江 源,彭秋志,廖剑宇,等.浮游藻类与河流生境关系研究进展与展望[J].资源科学,2013,35(3):461-472.
[10] 洪 松, 陈静生. 中国河流水生生物群落结构特征探讨[J]. 水生生物学报, 2002, 26(3):295-305.
[11] STEIBERG C E W, HARTMANN H M. Planktonic Bloom Forming Cyanobacteria and the Eutrophication of Lake and Rivers[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1988, 20: 279-287.
[12] 易仲强, 刘德富, 杨正健,等. 三峡水库香溪河库湾水温结构及其对春季水华的影响[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2009, 33(5):6-11.
[13] 王利利, 水动力条件下藻类生长相关影响因素研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2006.
[14] 陈燕琴, 李柯懋, 高桂香. 长江源沱沱河浮游植物群落结构及多样性评价[J]. 青海农林科技, 2017(2):1-5,58.
[15] MORAIS P, CHICHARO M A, BARBOSA A. Phytoplankton Dynamics in a Coastal Saline Lake (SE-Portugal)[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2003, 24(Supp.1): S87-S96.
[16] 武发思, 鄢金灼, 蔡泽平,等. 大、小苏干湖浮游藻类的群落组成特点研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2009, 33(2):264-270.
[17] WANG H, SHEN Z, GUO X, et al. Ammonia Adsorption and Nitritation in Sediments Derived from the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2010, 60(8): 1653-1660.
[18] 阮嘉玲, 三峡库区泥沙过程变异对浮游植物的影响及营养化评价方法研究[D]. 武汉:武汉轻工大学,2014.
[19] AZHIKODAN G, YOKOYAMA K. Spatio-temporal Variability of Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll-A) in Relation to Salinity, Suspended Sediment Concentration, and Light Intensity in a Macrotidal Estuary[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2016, 126:15-26.
[20] 胡 俊, 胡 鑫, 米玮洁,等. 多沙河流夏季浮游植物群落结构变化及水环境因子影响分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(12):1974-1982.
[21] 刘冬燕, 赵建夫, 张亚雷,等. 富营养水体生物修复中浮游植物的群落特征[J]. 水生生物学报, 2005, 29(2):177-183.
[22] 况琪军, 马沛明, 胡征宇,等. 湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2005,4(2):89-93.
[23] 郝媛媛,孙国钧,张立勋,等.黑河流域浮游植物群落特征与环境因子的关系[J].湖泊科学,2014,26(1):121-130.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(52009009);湖北省自然科学基金面上项目(2019CFB277);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2021485,CKSF2021743/HL)