利用修正Timoshenko梁理论,考虑地基黏性阻尼,建立黏弹性文克尔地基修正Timoshenko梁动力方程,解决了黏弹性地基经典深梁(Timoshenko)两频谱矛盾。利用复模态分析方法导出微分方程在多种约束条件下的复频率求解超越方程及其振型函数。当不计梁剪切转动惯量的影响时,方程可退化为黏弹性文克尔地基经典深梁计算模型;当不计梁剪切变形的影响及地基黏滞阻尼时,方程退化为常见的弹性地基Euler梁振动模型,其计算模型较为通用。分析了黏弹性地基梁在不同理论下的计算差别,结果表明:黏弹性地基Euler梁在高频段及梁长较短的低频段具有很大误差,黏弹性文克尔地基经典Timoshenko梁相对于Euler梁误差有所减小,但随阶次的增加相对误差逐次增大,在较高频段亦产生不可忽略的影响,证明了地基黏滞阻尼对地基梁振动低频段有较大影响。
Abstract
In the light of the modified Timoshenko beam theory, a vibration-control differential equation of the modified Timoshenko beam on viscoelastic Winkler foundation is established in consideration of the viscous damping of foundation. The present equation overcomes the shortcoming of the classical Timoshenko beam on viscoelastic foundation that “one mode has two frequencies”. The frequency solution to the transcendental equation and its modal function under various boundary conditions are derived by complex modal analysis. When the influence of shear inertia caused by shear deformation of beams is not taken into account, the equation degrades to the classical Timoshenko beam model of viscoelastic Winkler foundation; when the shear deformation of beams and the viscous damping of foundation are not taken into account, the equation decays to the common Euler beam vibration model of elastic foundation. The computational model in this paper is a more general one. The calculation differences of viscoelastic foundation beams under different theories are analyzed. The results show that Euler beams on viscoelastic foundation have great errors in high frequency band as well as in low frequency band with short beams. The error of classical Timoshenko beams on viscoelastic Winkler foundation is smaller than that of Euler beams; but the relative error increases gradually with the increase of order, and the influence cannot be ignored in high frequency band. The research finding proves that the viscous damping of foundation has great influence on the low frequency vibration of foundation beam.
关键词
黏弹性地基梁 /
修正Timoshenko梁 /
复模态 /
模态函数 /
两频谱
Key words
viscoelastic foundation beam /
modified Timoshenko beam /
complex mode /
modal function /
dual-spectrum
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] GE H H, XU J Y. A Numerical Method for Cavity Identification in Beams on an Elastic Foundation[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2007, 12(5): 540-545.
[2] BESKOU N D, MUHO E V. Dynamic Response of a Finite Beam Resting on a Winkler Foundation to a Load Moving on Its Surface with Variable Speed[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 109: 222-226.
[3] YANG X D, LIM C W, LIEW K M. Vibration and Stability of an Axially Moving Beam on Elastic Foundation[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2010, 13(2): 241-247.
[4] TIMOSHENKO S P. On the Correction of Shear of the Differential Equation for Transverse Vibrations of Prismatic Bars[J]. Philosophical Magazine, 1921, 641: 744-755.
[5] RUGE P, BIRK C. A Comparison of Infinite Timoshenko and Euler-Bernoulli Beam Models on Winkler Foundation in the Frequency- and Time-domain [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 304: 932-947.
[6] MAGRAB E B. Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes of Timoshenko Beams with Attachments[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2007, 13(7): 905-934.
[7] MORFIDIS K.Vibration of Timoshenko Beams on Three-parameter Elastic Foundation[J]. Computers and Structures, 2010, 88: 294-308.
[8] BESKOU N D,THEODORAKOPOULOS D D. Dynamic Effects of Moving Loads on Road Pavements: A Review[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31: 547-567.
[9] ÇALIM F F. Structural Dynamic Analysis of Beams on Viscoelastic Foundation [J]. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2009, 28: 469-476.
[10]SUN L, LUO F Q. Steady-state Dynamic Response of a Bernoulli-Euler Beam on a Viscoelastic Foundation Subject to a Platoon of Moving Dynamic Loads[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, ASME, 2008, 130(5): 1-19.
[11]DING H, SHI K L, CHEN LQ, et al. Dynamic Response of an Infinite Timoshenko Beam on a Nonlinear Viscoelastic Foundation to a Moving Load[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 73: 285-298.
[12]DING H, CHEN L Q, YANG S P. Convergence of Galerkin Truncation for Dynamic Response of Finite Beams on Nonlinear Foundations under a Moving Load[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2012, 331: 2425-2442.
[13]DING H, YANG Y, CHEN L Q, et al. Vibration of Vehicle-Pavement Coupled System Based on a Timoshenko Beam on a Nonlinear Foundation[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333: 6623-6636.
[14]陈 镕, 万春风, 薛松涛, 等. Timoshenko梁运动方程的修正及其影响[J]. 同济大学学报, 2005, 33(6): 711-715.
[15]陈 镕, 万春风, 薛松涛, 等. 无约束修正Timoshenko梁的冲击问题[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38(2): 262-269.
[16]YANG Y, CHEN X D, FAN Z C, et al. Analysis of the Dynamic Stress Intensity Factor of an Impacted Freely Supported Bend Specimen Based on Modified Timoshenko's Beam Theory [C]∥Procedia Engineering, Fourteenth International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, Shanghai, China. September 23-26, 2015: 731-745.
[17]LI D S, YANG Y Q, LI K P, et al. Experimental Axial Force Identification Based on Modified Timoshenko Beam Theory [J]. Structural Monitoring and Maintenance, 2017, 4(2): 153-173.
[18]STEPHEN N G. The Second Spectrum of Timoshenko Beam Theory—Further Assessment[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 292: 372-389.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(812778072);长沙理工大学土木工程优势重点学科创新基金项目(16ZDXK09)
PDF(4832 KB)
