建立与真实状态相近的初始渗流场是正确分析边坡降雨入渗的重要前提。鉴于目前FLAC3D中的饱和-非饱和渗流场初始化方法寥寥无几,提出并详细介绍了饱和-非饱和渗流场初始化的设置方法。根据5种分布形式的基质吸力,按照其基质吸力线性分布和非线性分布规律提出了2种对应的初始化方法:对于线性分布的基质吸力运用MIDAS建模和FLAC3D内置FISH语言进行渗流场初始化设置;对于非线性分布的基质吸力,用函数来表示其复杂几何形态的地下水位面具有一定的难度,不适合大面积推广应用,将地下水位面简化成一平面后,可利用FISH语言编程进行渗流场初始化设置。通过与常规渗流场初始化方法的计算结果对比,初始渗流场对边坡降雨入渗最终计算结果有较大影响,初始渗流场与真实状态越相近,其计算精度越高。
Abstract
The establishment of initial seepage field close to the real state is an important prerequisite for the correct analysis of slope rainfall infiltration. In view that methods of initializing saturated-unsaturated seepage field in FLAC3D are rarely reported, in this paper we put forward and introduce in detail the setup method of initializing saturated-unsaturated seepage field. According to the five distribution forms of matric suction, two initialization methods are proposed corresponding to the linear and non-linear distribution laws of matric suction. For the linear distribution of matric suction, MIDAS modeling and FLAC3D built-in FISH language are employed to initialize the seepage field. For non-linear distribution, since it is difficult to represent the complex geometry of groundwater level surface by using function, the groundwater level is simplified into a plane for the initial setting of seepage field by using FISH programming language. Comparison with conventional initialization method demonstrated that the initial seepage field has a great influence on the final calculation result of slope rainfall infiltration. When the initial seepage field is closer to the real state, the calculation accuracy is higher.
关键词
FLAC3D /
渗流场 /
初始化 /
饱和-非饱和 /
基质吸力
Key words
FLAC3D /
seepage field /
initialization /
saturated-unsaturated /
matric suction
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 彭文斌. FLAC 3D实用教程[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2008.
[2] 陈育民, 徐鼎平. FLAC\\FLAC3D基础与工程实例[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2013.
[3] 史 可.中原镇集镇滑坡稳定性研究[D].西安:长安大学,2017.
[4] GENUCHTEN M T V. A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils1[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5):734-742.
[5] 蒋中明,熊小虎,曾 铃. 基于FLAC3D平台的边坡非饱和降雨入渗分析[J].岩土力学,2014,35(3):855-861.
[6] 郭震山, 赵建斌, 赵紫阳. 降雨入渗条件下抗滑桩加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2017,34(4):48-52.
[7] ZHU X, XU Q, TANG M, et al. Comparison of Two Optimized Machine Learning Models for Predicting Displacement of Rainfall-Induced Landslide: A Case Study in Sichuan Province, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 218: 213-222.
[8] 谢 强,田大浪,刘金辉,等. 土质边坡的饱和-非饱和渗流分析及特殊应力修正[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 30(3):810-814.
[9] 吴俊杰, 王成华, 李广信. 非饱和土基质吸力对边坡稳定的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(5):732-736.
[10]王阳平, 崔颖辉. 基于Midas/Gts的FLAC3D的建模方法[J]. 北方工业大学学报, 2010, 22(3):78-81.
[11]胡 冉, 陈益峰, 周创兵. 降雨入渗过程中土质边坡的固-液-气三相耦合分析[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2011, 41(11):1469-1482.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(41572291);四川省青年科技创新研究团队专项计划项目(2017TD0018);地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室团队项目(SKLGP2016Z001)