变质岩区深埋长大隧道初始地应力场反演研究

黄祥嘉,李相慧

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 106-110.

PDF(2471 KB)
PDF(2471 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 106-110. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150955
岩土工程

变质岩区深埋长大隧道初始地应力场反演研究

  • 黄祥嘉,李相慧
作者信息 +

Back Analysis of In-situ Stress Field of Metamorphic Rock in Deep Buried Large Tunnel

  • HUANG Xiang-jia, LI Xiang-hui
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

初始地应力场是岩土工程设计和施工所要考虑的首要因素。依托十房(十堰至房县)高速通省隧道地应力量测资料,调整不同组合的侧压系数,获得了隧址区岩体多组地应力。利用残差函数,分别计算了各向同性与各向异性本构关系下每一组侧压系数的残差,并进行了对比分析,确定了不同本构关系的最优侧压系数。利用获得的侧压系数,反演计算测试点的地应力,通过与实测结果的对比分析确定了与隧址区岩体适宜的本构关系,最终得到了隧道的初始地应力场分布规律。研究表明,初始地应力场与隧道的埋深和地形地貌有关,且通省隧道更适于在各向异性本构关系下进行地应力场反演,误差幅值约为10%。

Abstract

Initial in-situ stress is a primary factor for the design and construction in rock engineering. According to the data of Tongsheng tunnel of Shiyan-Fangxian express highway, different groups of in-situ stress in the tunnel site were acquired by adjusting lateral pressure coefficient. The residuals of different lateral pressure coefficients in isotropic and anisotropic constitutive relations were calculated by constructing a residual function. Through comparing and analyzing the results, the optimal lateral pressure coefficient for the tunnel site was confirmed. Furthermore, the in-situ stress of metamorphic rock at test points was retrieved.The constitutive relation of rock mass at the tunnel site was determined through comparison with measured values. Finally the distribution of in-situ stress field of the tunnel was obtained. The research shows that the initial in-situ stress field is related to the buried depth and the topography of tunnel. The anisotropic constitutive relation is adaptive for Tongsheng tunnel and the error is about 10%.

关键词

深埋隧道 / 水压致裂法 / 本构关系 / 地应力场反演 / 数值模拟

Key words

deep buried tunnel / hydro-fracturing method / constitutive relation / back analysis of in-situ stress field / numerical simulation

引用本文

导出引用
黄祥嘉,李相慧. 变质岩区深埋长大隧道初始地应力场反演研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2017, 34(3): 106-110 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20150955
HUANG Xiang-jia, LI Xiang-hui. Back Analysis of In-situ Stress Field of Metamorphic Rock in Deep Buried Large Tunnel[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2017, 34(3): 106-110 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20150955
中图分类号: U452    TU459.4   

参考文献

[1] 李青麒. 初始应力的回归与三维拟合[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1998, 20(5): 71-74.
[2] 杨林德. 岩土工程问题的反演理论与工程实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1996.
[3] 景 锋, 盛 谦, 张勇慧, 等. 我国原位地应力测量与地应力场分析研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2011,(增2): 51-58.
[4] 蔡美峰,乔 兰,李华斌. 地应力测量原理和技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1995.
[5] 夏彬伟, 李晓红, 韩昌瑞, 等. 深埋隧道层状岩体地应力反演研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2009, 36(4): 75-79.
[6] 袁 征, 程远方, 时 贤, 等. 水力压裂数据水平地应力反演模型研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(1): 157-159.
[7] 周洪波, 付成华. 弹性和弹塑性有限元在溪洛渡水电站坝区地应力反演中的应用[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2006, 23(6): 63-67.
[8] 李 强, 李端有. 基于人工神经网络的滑坡稳定性评估研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2005, 22(6):13-15.
[9]SAVINS J G.Hydraulic Fracturing Technique:US,US4067389A[P]. 1978-01-10.
[10]汪安全, 艾 凯, 尹健民. 巴贡水电站引水洞地应力测量及分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2013, 30(6): 72-75.
[11]刘佑荣,唐辉明. 岩体力学[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 1999.
[12]周维垣. 高等岩石力学[M]. 北京:水利电力出版社,1990.
[13]谢红强, 肖明砾, 何江达,等. 锦屏水电站坝区初始地应力场回归反演分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2008, 25(5):50-54.
[14]HUANG J, GRIFFITHS D V, WONG S W. In situ Stress Determination from Inversion of Hydraulic Fracturing Data[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(3):476-481.

PDF(2471 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map