基于WPI模型的重庆市水资源安全分析

张 喆,何太蓉,舒瑞琴,刘 欢

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4) : 1-5.

PDF(892 KB)
PDF(892 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4) : 1-5. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150573
水资源与环境

基于WPI模型的重庆市水资源安全分析

  • 张 喆a,何太蓉a,b,舒瑞琴a,刘 欢a
作者信息 +

Analysis of Water Resources Security inChongqing City Based on WPI Model

  • ZHANG Zhe1, HE Tai-rong1,2, SHU Rui-qin1, LIU Huan1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为综合评价重庆市水资源安全情势,分析多重背景下水资源安全影响因素,以WPI模型构建水资源安全评价指标体系,该体系分为5个子系统资源(R)、途径(A)、效率(U)、能力(C)和环境(E)。采用加权函数法计算1997—2013年重庆市水资源安全综合评价指数和5个子系统得分值,并利用因子分析法进行对比分析;建立水资源安全因素判定模型,对子系统进行优等、中等、劣等因素划分。结果表明重庆市水资源安全值呈阶梯式上升,趋势系数为0.022 8 /a,水资源安全状况趋于好转,并且与因子分析对比结果基本一致;但各子系统时序变化差异较大,途径和能力子系统分值逐年上升,资源和环境子系统分值比早年有所下降,该阶段的效率子系统分值变化不大;因素评判结果显示,途径因素和能力因素随着时间推移而不断提高,从劣等因素变为优等因素,但资源和环境因素却逐渐演变为重庆市水资源安全的劣等因素,效率因素降为中等因素。未来重庆市水资源安全存在一定风险,需加强水资源管理和水环境改善,提高公民节水意识来加以防范。

Abstract

The aim of this research is to comprehensively assess the situation of water resource security in Chongqing city and analyze the influencing factors in multiple background. We built an assessment index system of water resources security based on WPI model. The system consists of five subsystems: resource (R), access (A), usage (U), capacity (C), and environment (E). We calculated the comprehensive security index of water resources and the five subsystems’ scores during 1997-2013 in Chongqing city using weighting function method, and conducted comparative analysis by using the method of factor analysis. Furthermore, we established factors rating model and classified the five subsystems into superior, medium and inferior. Results revealed that the water resources security index of Chongqing increased progressively during 1997-2013, and the coefficients of overall trend was 0.0228/a, indicating that the situation of water resources security improved and the assessment result was consistent with factor analysis. However, the five subsystems had a different variation tendency in time. Among the five subsystems, the scores of access subsystem and capacity subsystem were rising year by year. Compared with earlier years, the scores of resource subsystem and environment subsystem in late years declined. But the score of usage subsystem changed a little. The access factor and capacity factor evolved from inferior to superior while the resource factor and environment factor degraded into the inferior. The efficiency factor degraded into medium from superior. According to the above results, we conclude that the situation of water resources security in Chongqing city has risk possibility in the future. Therefore, the management of water resources should be strengthened and water environment should also be improved, and the water-saving awareness should be intensified.

关键词

水资源安全 / WPI模型 / 因素评判模型 / 因子分析法 / 重庆市

Key words

water resources security / WPI model / factors rating model / factor analysis / Chongqing city

引用本文

导出引用
张 喆,何太蓉,舒瑞琴,刘 欢. 基于WPI模型的重庆市水资源安全分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2016, 33(4): 1-5 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20150573
ZHANG Zhe, HE Tai-rong, SHU Rui-qin, LIU Huan. Analysis of Water Resources Security inChongqing City Based on WPI Model[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2016, 33(4): 1-5 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20150573
中图分类号: TV211.1   

参考文献

[1] 贾绍凤,张军岩,张士锋. 区域水资源压力指数与水资源安全评价指标体系.地理科学进展,2002, 21(6): 538-545.
贾绍凤,张士锋. 海河流域水资源安全评价.地理科学进展,2003, 22(4): 379-387.
刘斌涛,陶和平,孔 博,等. 云南省水资源时空分布格局及综合评价.自然资源学报,2014,29(3):454-464.
夏 军,朱一中. 水资源安全的度量:水资源承载力的研究与挑战.自然资源学报,2002, 17(3): 262-269.
李书恒,周寅康.中国西北干旱地区水资源安全评价初探——以新疆尉犁县为例.干旱区研究,2004, 21(3): 230-234.
杨理智,张 韧,洪 梅,等. 基于云模型的我国西南边境水资源安全风险评估.长江资源流域与环境,2014, 23(增1): 1-5.
李少华,董增川,周 毅. 复杂巨系统视角下的水资源安全及其研究方法.水资源保护,2007, 23(2): 1-3.
金菊良,吴开亚,魏一鸣. 基于联系数的流域水安全评价模型.水利学报,2008, 39(4): 401-409.
邵薇薇,杨人大.水贫乏指数的概念及其在中国主要流域的初步应用.水利学报,2007, 38(7):866-872.
SULKIVAN C A,MEIGH J R,GIACOMELLO A M. The Water Poverty Index: Development and Application at the Community Scale. Natural Resources Forum, 2003, 27(3): 189-199.
陈 莉,石培基,魏 伟,等. 干旱区内陆河流域水贫困时空分异研究——以石羊河为例.资源科学,2013, 35(7): 1373-1379.
曹 茜,刘 锐.基于WPI模型的赣江流域水资源贫困评价.资源科学,2012, 34(7): 1306-1311.
贡 力,靳春玲.基于水贫困指数的城市水安全评价研究.水利发电学报,2014, 33(6): 84-90.
黄玉宝,徐 刚,王 虎. 基于熵权法的重庆市水安全时间变化研究.西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013, 38(5): 127-133.
舒瑞琴,何太蓉,班荣舶. 重庆市沙坪坝区水资源安全模糊综合评价.水电能源科,2013, 31(8): 31-34.
孙才志,王雪妮. 基于WPI-ESDA模型的中国水贫困评价及空间关联格局分析.资源科学,2011, 33(6): 1073-1082.
肖新成,何丙辉,倪九派,等.农业面源污染视角下的三峡库区重庆段水资源的安全性评价——基于 DPSIR框架的分析.环境科学学报,2013, 33(8): 2324-2331.
ZHANG Rui-jun, DUAN Zheng-hu, TAN Ming-liang, et al. The Assessment of Water Stress with the Water Poverty Index in the Shiyang River Basin in China. Environ. Earth Sci., 2012, 67: 2155-2160.
杨玉蓉,张青山,邹 君. 基于村级尺度的湖南农村水贫困比较研究.长江资源流域与环境,2014, 23(7): 1027-1034.
高媛媛,王红瑞,许新宜,等. 水资源安全评价模型构建与应用——以福建省泉州市为例.自然资源学报,2012, 27(2): 204-213.
付恒阳, 潘红霞. 世界水危机及对策探讨. raybet体育在线 院报, 2013, 30(5):17-21.

基金

重庆市科委软科学计划项目(CSTC2011CX-rkxA0280)

PDF(892 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map