基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究

刘光凤,王林,周泽,邢青松

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10) : 111-115.

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10) : 111-115. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150402
岩土工程

基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究

  • 刘光凤1,王林1,周泽2,邢青松1
作者信息 +

Optimization of Slope Treatment Schemes Based on Gray Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making

  • LIU Guang-feng1, WANG Lin1, ZHOU Ze2, XING Qing-song1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为抑制边坡处治中常见的边坡处治方案选择不合理的现象,根据边坡处治方案优选过程的灰性、模糊性、多属性、群体性特征和安全、质量、造价、工期、环境5大建设管理基本目标,运用灰度、隶属度、多属性和群决策构建基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选模型。以布卡隧道进口K214+500至K214+700边坡工程为例,验证所构建模型的可行性。研究结果表明该模型能够充分利用受邀专家的咨询意见,使优选过程考虑更全面、更符合实际,提高优选结果的准确性,具有较好的实用性。

Abstract

To curb the common phenomenon that slope treatment schemes are selected unreasonably in practice, a model of optimizing slope treatment schemes based on gray fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making is proposed through combined application of membership degree, gray degree, multi-attribute decision-making, and group decision-making. The fuzzy, gray, multi-attribute, and group characteristics of slope treatment schemes optimizationprocess as well as five basic goals of safety, quality, cost, time and environment in project construction management are taken as the basis. The slope treatment project from K214+500 to K214+700 of Buka tunnel entrance is taken as a case study to verify the feasibility of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed model is more comprehensive and practical by making full use of invited experts’ advices. It also improves the accuracy of the optimization result.

关键词

边坡处治 / 方案优选 / 灰色模糊多属性群决策 / 灰色模糊集 / 灰度 / 隶属度

Key words

slope treatment / optimization of schemes / gray fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making / gray fuzzy set / gray degree / membership degree

引用本文

导出引用
刘光凤,王林,周泽,邢青松. 基于灰色模糊多属性群决策的边坡处治方案优选研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2016, 33(10): 111-115 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20150402
LIU Guang-feng, WANG Lin, ZHOU Ze, XING Qing-song. Optimization of Slope Treatment Schemes Based on Gray Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2016, 33(10): 111-115 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20150402
中图分类号: U416.0   

参考文献

[1] 夏元友,朱瑞赓. 不稳定边坡治理方案的多层次模糊综合群决策[J]. 自然灾害学报, 1998,7(1):62-67.
[2] 谢全敏,夏元友. 岩体边坡治理决策的模糊层次分析方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(7):1117-1120.
[3] XIE Quan-min, ZHU Rui-gen. Gray Classification for Evaluating the Stability of Dangerous Rock Block Masses[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Materials Science, 2000, 15(1):73-77
[4] 谢全敏,夏元友,朱瑞赓. 边坡治理方案评判体系的层次结构模型及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2001, 20(增1): 1065-1069.
[5] 谢全敏,夏元友. 边坡治理决策的改进层次结构模型及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(1):86-88.
[6] 谢全敏,夏元友. 边坡治理多层次多目标优化决策方法研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2002, 24(10):21-24.
[7] XIE Quan-min, XIA Yuan-you. A Multi-objective Decision-making Method for the Treatment Scheme of Landslide Hazard[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2004, 11(2): 101-105
[8] 杨海红, 李红英. 层次分析法在黄土边坡治理方案优选中的应用[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2006, 23(3): 55-58.
[9] 叶万军,折学森,陈志新,等. 基于工程模糊集理论的边坡治理方案优化[J]. 公路交通科技, 2008,25(6):30-34.
[10]房 秀, 申 翃. 边坡治理方案选择的多属性多方案大群体决策方法[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2011,25(4):340-344.
[11]周志军,张铁柱,牛 涌,等. 基于区间模糊分析法的边坡治理方案决策[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版),2013,33(1):1-5.
[12]冯 晓,徐明明,李明果. 边坡治理方案优选的模糊多属性决策改进方法[J]. 路基工程, 2014,(4):39-43.
[13]夏元友,朱瑞赓. 病害边坡治理方案选择的智能辅助决策系统[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1998,17(4):453-458.
[14]谢全敏,丁保艳,吴定洪,等. 基于案例的边坡治理方案选择决策支持系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008,29(5):1351-1355.
[15]谢全敏,王红彬,吴定洪,等. 边坡治理群决策的二维足码定位法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009,30(2): 429-432.
[16]卜广志,张宇文. 基于灰色模糊关系的灰色模糊综合评判[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2002, (4):141-143.
[17]WANG Juite, LIN Yung-I. A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision Making Approach to Select Configuration Items for Software Development[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 134(3): 343-363.
[18]靳 娜,娄寿春. 一种灰色模糊多属性决策模型[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2004,29(4):26-28.
[19]罗 党,王 伟,吕 健. 一类不确定决策问题的变权分析方法[J]. 郑州大学学报(理学版), 2005,37(1): 99-103

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(71401019);重庆市社会科学规划项目(2011YBGL112)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map