院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 23-27.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150128

• 水资源与环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江流域火电工业取用水定额多目标评价分析

邓敏慧1, 周研来2,3, 桑连海2   

  1. 1.宝山钢铁股份有限公司,上海 200941;
    2. 水资源综合利用研究所,武汉 430010;
    3.武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-09 出版日期:2016-05-01 发布日期:2016-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 周研来(1985-),男,湖南娄底人,工程师,博士,主要从事水文学及水资源开发利用研究,(电话)027-82927557(电子信箱)zyl23bulls@whu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:邓敏慧(1984-),女,四川南充人,工程师,主要从事火电厂用水管理研究,(电话)13611760610(电子信箱)dengminhui@baosteel.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51509008);湖北省自然科学基金项目(2015CFB217);武汉大学水资源水电工程科学国家重点实验室开放基金项目(2014SWG02)

Multi-objective Evaluation of Water Intake Quantity and Quota for Fossil-fuel Power Stations in Changjiang River Basin

DENG Min-hui1, ZHOU Yan-lai2,3, SANG Lian-hai2   

  1. 1.Baoshan Iron and Steel Limited Company, Shanghai 200941, China;
    2.Water Resources Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China;
    3.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2015-02-09 Online:2016-05-01 Published:2016-05-10

PDF

1549

摘要： 针对单目标评价方法无法有效地评价火电工业取用水定额的优劣程度问题,基于投影寻踪法对长江流域火电工业取用水定额进行了多目标评价。首先分析了单目标评价方法对火电工业取用水定额的优劣评价结果;在此基础上开展了基于投影寻踪法的长江流域火电工业取用水定额的多目标评价研究。研究结果表明:长江下游地区的江苏华能太仓电厂三期工程的综合评分最高,而长江下游地区的江苏南通新区热电厂二期扩建工程的综合评分最低,评价结果相对合理客观。基于投影寻踪法的多目标评价相比单目标评价方法,可有效传递和辨识评价指标的信息价值,可给出长江流域火电工业取用水定额合理且客观的综合评价,推荐采用差评、合格、良好和优异4级综合指标划分法对火力发电厂取用水定额进行分级评价。

关键词: 火电工业, 取用水定额, 长江流域, 投影寻踪法, 单目标评价

Abstract: Single-objective evaluation method cannot effectively evaluate the rationality of water intake quantity and quota of fossil-fuel power station. In view of this, a multi-objective evaluation method based on projection pursuit was employed to evaluate the reasonability of water intake quantity and quota of fossil-fuel power stations in Changjiang River basin. Firstly, single-objective evaluation method was applied to evaluation and the result was analyzed. On this basis, multi-objective evaluation was conducted. Results show that the comprehensive score of Taicang fossil-fuel power station phase III is the highest and Nantong thermal power plant phase II is the lowest. This multi-objective evaluation method based on projection pursuit could effectively identify the information value of evaluation indexes, and give rational and objective assessment result. Four ranks (unqualified, qualified, good, and excellent) are recommended for the rating.

Key words: fossil-fuel power station, water intake quantity and quota, Changjiang River Basin, projection pursuit method, single-objective evaluation

中图分类号: 

*严禁使用本系统存储、处理、传输涉密信息*
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn
Baidu
map